The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Real-Time Sensor Anomaly Detection and Identification in Automated Vehicles
Abstract
Connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) are expected to revolutionize the transportation industry, mainly through allowing for a real-time and seamless exchange of information between vehicles and roadside infrastructure. Although connectivity and automation are projected to bring about a vast number of benefits, they can give rise to new challenges in terms of safety, security, and privacy. To navigate roadways, CAVs need to heavily rely on their sensor readings and the information received from other vehicles and roadside units. Hence, anomalous sensor readings caused by either malicious cyber attacks or faulty vehicle sensors can result in disruptive consequences and possibly lead to fatal crashes. As a result, before the mass implementation of CAVs, it is important to develop methodologies that can detect anomalies and identify their sources seamlessly and in real time. In this paper, we develop an anomaly detection approach through combining a deep learning method, namely convolutional neural network (CNN), with a well-established anomaly detection method, and Kalman filtering with a χ2-detector, to detect and identify anomalous behavior in CAVs. Our numerical experiments demonstrate that the developed approach can detect anomalies and identify their sources with high accuracy, sensitivity, and F1 score. In addition, this developed approach outperforms the anomaly detection and identification capabilities of both CNNs and Kalman filtering with a χ2-detector method alone. It is envisioned that this research will contribute to the development of safer and more resilient CAV systems that implement a holistic view toward intelligent transportation system (ITS) concepts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
(2014) · Cited by 33,419
A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems
Kalman, R. E. (1960) · Journal of Basic Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.3662552 · Cited by 31,751
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
Multisensor data fusion: A review of the state-of-the-art
Khaleghi, B., Khamis, A., Karray, F. O., & Razavi, S. N. (2013) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2011.08.001 · Cited by 2,074
Editorial: special issue on learning from imbalanced data sets
Chawla, N. V., Japkowicz, N., & Kotcz, A. (2004) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1007730.1007733 · Cited by 2,063
Experimental Security Analysis of a Modern Automobile
Koscher, K., Czeskis, A., Roesner, F., Patel, S., Kohno, T., Checkoway, S., McCoy, D., Kantor, B., Anderson, D., Shacham, H., et al. (2010) · 2010 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.2010.34 · Cited by 1,849
(2011) · Cited by 1,423
Network Anomaly Detection: Methods, Systems and Tools
Bhuyan, M. H., Bhattacharyya, D. K., & Kalita, J. K. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2013.052213.00046 · Cited by 1,348
Cited by
Theissler, A., Pérez-Velázquez, J., Kettelgerdes, M., & Elger, G. (2021) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2021.107864 · Cited by 581
Deep Learning-based Anomaly Detection in Cyber-physical Systems: Progress and Opportunities
Luo, Y., Xiao, Y., Cheng, L., Peng, G., & Yao, D. (. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3453155 · Cited by 268
Machine Learning Methods in Smart Lighting Toward Achieving User Comfort: A Survey
Putrada, A. G., Abdurohman, M., Perdana, D., & Nuha, H. H. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3169765 · Cited by 101
“Van et al. [428] uses anomaly detection to find faulty sensors in connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) in the build phase.”
BackgroundA Systematic Analysis of Enhancing Cyber Security Using Deep Learning for Cyber Physical Systems
Gaba, S., Budhiraja, I., Kumar, V., Martha, S., Khurmi, J., Singh, A., Singh, K. K., Askar, S. S., & Abouhawwash, M. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3349022 · Cited by 62
Gao, B., Bu, B., Zhang, W., & Li, X. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2021.3058553 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- van Wyk, F., Wang, Y., Khojandi, A., & Masoud, N.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1264-1276
- ISSN
- 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0016
- OpenAlex
- W2945434604
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 11.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Real-Time Sensor Anomaly Detection and Identification in Automated Vehicles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tits.2019.2906038
- The paper
- van Wyk, F., Wang, Y., Khojandi, A., & Masoud, N. (2020). Real-Time Sensor Anomaly Detection and Identification in Automated Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2019.2906038
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.