Cited by 176Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningArtificial Intelligence Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 179 of the 179 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Survey on Large Language Model-Enhanced Reinforcement Learning: Concept, Taxonomy, and Methods

Open access
Cao, Yuji, Zhao, Huan, Cheng, Yuheng, Shu, Ting, Chen, Yue, Liu, Guolong, Liang, Gaoqi, Zhao, Junhua, Yan, Jinyue, Li, Yun·2025·IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems

Abstract

With extensive pretrained knowledge and high-level general capabilities, large language models (LLMs) emerge as a promising avenue to augment reinforcement learning (RL) in aspects, such as multitask learning, sample efficiency, and high-level task planning. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive review of the existing literature in LLM-enhanced RL and summarize its characteristics compared with conventional RL methods, aiming to clarify the research scope and directions for future studies. Utilizing the classical agent-environment interaction paradigm, we propose a structured taxonomy to systematically categorize LLMs' functionalities in RL, including four roles: information processor, reward designer, decision-maker, and generator. For each role, we summarize the methodologies, analyze the specific RL challenges that are mitigated and provide insights into future directions. Finally, the comparative analysis of each role, potential applications, prospective opportunities, and challenges of the LLM-enhanced RL are discussed. By proposing this taxonomy, we aim to provide a framework for researchers to effectively leverage LLMs in the RL field, potentially accelerating RL applications in complex applications, such as robotics, autonomous driving, and energy systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnnls.2024.3497992

Cites

179 of 179 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Sutton, 2018, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
  2. Schmid, 2021, Rebel: A general game playing AI, Science, 373, 664
  3. Mandlekar, 2021, What matters in learning from offline human demonstrations for robot manipulation, arXiv:2108.03298 · arXiv
  4. Radford, 2018, Improving Language Understanding By Generative Pre-Training
  5. Devidze, Exploration-guided reward shaping for reinforcement learning under sparse rewards, 35, 5829
  6. Cho, Hard tasks first: Multi-task reinforcement learning through task scheduling, 1
  7. Zhang, Efficient multi-task reinforcement learning via selective behavior sharing, 1
  8. Yuan, 2023, Plan4mc: Skill reinforcement learning and planning for open-world minecraft tasks, arXiv:2303.16563 · arXiv
  9. Paischer, 2023, History compression via language models in reinforcement learning, arXiv:2205.12258 · arXiv
  10. 10.1109/ICRA48891.2023.10160591 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Spiegel, Informing reinforcement learning agents by grounding language to Markov decision processes, 1
  12. Nair, 2022, R3M: A universal visual representation for robot manipulation, arXiv:2203.12601 · arXiv
  13. Xie, Text2reward: Reward shaping with language models for reinforcement learning, 1
  14. Chakraborty, 2023, REBEL: A regularization-based solution for reward overoptimization in robotic reinforcement learning from human feedback, arXiv:2312.14436 · arXiv
  15. Fu, 2020, D4RL: Datasets for deep data-driven reinforcement learning, arXiv:2004.07219 · arXiv
  16. Robine, 2023, Transformer-based world models are happy with 100k interactions, arXiv:2303.07109 · arXiv
  17. Das, State2explanation: Concept-based explanations to benefit agent learning and user understanding, 1
  18. Slumbers, Leveraging large language models for optimised coordination in textual multi-agent reinforcement learning, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Cao, Y., Zhao, H., Cheng, Y., Shu, T., Chen, Y., Liu, G., Liang, G., Zhao, J., Yan, J., & Li, Y.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CN)
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
Published
2025-06
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
9737-9757
ISSN
  • 2162-237X (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-2388
OpenAlex
W4393763811
Cited by
174
References
176
Citations by year
2026: 87 · 2025: 79
FWCI
25.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (72331009, 72171206, 92270105)
  • Guangdong Power Grid Company (GDKJXM20231024)
  • Shenzhen Key Lab of Crowd Intelligence Empowered Low-Carbon Energy Network (ZDSYS20220606100601002)
  • Shenzhen Natural Science Fund (GXWD20231128112434001)
  • Shenzhen Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Society
  • PolyU Direct Grant (P0047700, P0043885, P0051105)
  • CUHK Strategic Partnership Award for Research Collaboration (4750467)
  • CUHK Direct Grant for Research (4055228)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
large language models, reinforcement learning, reward function design, multi-task learning, sample efficiency, task planning, agent-environment interaction, robotics, autonomous driving, energy systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review