The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonlinear sinogram smoothing for low-dose X-ray CT
Abstract
When excessive quantum noise is present in extremely low dose X-ray CT imaging, statistical properties of the data has to be considered to achieve a satisfactory image reconstruction. Statistical iterative reconstruction with accurate modeling of the noise, rather than a filtered back-projection (FBP) with low-pass filtering, is one way to deal with the problem. Estimating a noise-free sinogram to satisfy the FBP reconstruction for the Radon transform is another way. The benefits of the latter include a higher computation efficiency, more uniform spatial resolution in the reconstructed image, and less modification of the current machine configurations. In a clinic X-ray CT system, the acquired raw data must be calibrated, in addition to the logarithmic transform, to achieve the high diagnostic image quality. The calibrated projection data or sinogram no longer follow a compound Poisson distribution in general, but are close to a Gaussian distribution with signal-dependent variance. In this paper, we first investigated a relatively accurate statistical model for the sinogram data, based on several phantom experiments. Then we developed a penalized likelihood method to smooth the sinogram, which led to a set of nonlinear equations that can be solved by iterated conditional mode (ICM) algorithm within a reasonable computing time. The method was applied to several experimental datasets acquired at 120 kVp, 10 mA/20 mA/50 mA protocols with a GE HiSpeed multi-slice detector CT scanner and demonstrated a significant noise suppression without noticeable sacrifice of the spatial resolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images.
Geman, S., & Geman, D. (1984) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1984.4767596 · Cited by 17,949
Random variables and stochastic processes
Larson, H. J., & Shubert, B. O. (1979) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 4,640
On the Statistical Analysis of Dirty Pictures
Besag, J. (1986) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1986.tb01412.x · Cited by 4,191
Statistical image reconstruction for polyenergetic X-ray computed tomography
Elbakri, I. A., & Fessler, J. A. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.993128 · Cited by 691
Penalized weighted least-squares image reconstruction for positron emission tomography
Fessler, J. A. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.293921 · Cited by 611
Medical Imaging Systems: An Introductory Guide
(2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96520-8 · Cited by 416
Noise properties of low-dose CT projections and noise treatment by scale transformations
Lu, H., Hsiao, I., Li, X., & Liang, Z. (2005) · IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC) · doi:10.1109/nssmic.2001.1008660 · Cited by 99
Self-citationLei, T., & Sewchand, W. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.126910 · Cited by 85
1. Random Variables and Stochastic Processes
Parzen, E. (1999) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611971125.ch1 · Cited by 67
Liang, Z. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.293924 · Cited by 60
Self-citation
Cited by
aLow-dose CT via convolutional neural network
Chen, H., Zhang, Y., Zhang, W., Liao, P., Li, K., Zhou, J., & Wang, G. (2017) · Biomedical Optics Express · doi:10.1364/boe.8.000679 · Cited by 755
Wang, J., Li, T., Lu, H., & Liang, Z. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2006.882141 · Cited by 533
Self-citationProjection space denoising with bilateral filtering and CT noise modeling for dose reduction in CT
Manduca, A., Yu, L., Trzasko, J. D., Khaylova, N., Kofler, J. M., McCollough, C. M., & Fletcher, J. G. (2009) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.3232004 · Cited by 360
Li, M., Hsu, W., Xie, X., Cong, J., & Gao, W. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2020.2968472 · Cited by 321
Compressed sensing based cone‐beam computed tomography reconstruction with a first‐order methoda)
Choi, K., Wang, J., Zhu, L., Suh, T., Boyd, S., & Xing, L. (2010) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.3481510 · Cited by 255
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, T., Li, X., Wang, J., Wen, J., Lu, H., Hsieh, J., & Liang, Z.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2505-2513
- ISSN
- 0018-9499 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142743510
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 5.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonlinear sinogram smoothing for low-dose X-ray CT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tns.2004.834824
- The paper
- Li, T., Li, X., Wang, J., Wen, J., Lu, H., Hsieh, J., & Liang, Z. (2004). Nonlinear sinogram smoothing for low-dose X-ray CT. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. https://doi.org/10.1109/tns.2004.834824
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.