Cited by 27Low-Pressure Plasma Processing and DiagnosticsVacuum and Plasma ArcsAtmospheric-Pressure Plasma Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Particle-in-Cell Simulations With Fluid Metastable Atoms in Capacitive Argon Discharges: Electron Elastic Scattering and Plasma Density Profile Transition

Wen, De-Qi, Krek, Janez, Gudmundsson, Jon Tomas, Kawamura, Emi, Lieberman, Michael A., Verboncoeur, John P.·2022·IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science

Abstract

Particle-in-cell/Monte Carlo collision (PIC/MCC) simulations are an important tool for understanding low-temperature plasma dynamics, and benchmark work is needed to build a solid base for the correctness of PIC/MCC codes. In our recent publication (Wenet al., 2021), benchmarking of the object-oriented PIC/MCC oopd1 code was performed against the well-establishedxpdp1code for a simplified argon reaction set. Furthermore, oopd1 was upgraded to incorporate the excited state atoms as space- and time-varying fluids. Here, we show more details and perform further analysis of the benchmark work. The plasma density profile transition is further explored; the “passively” flat plasma density profile in the absence of metastables is found to be parabolic at low pressure and flat at 1.6 and 5 Torr. In the presence of metastable atoms, the “parabolic” profile at 5 Torr becomes “flat” at 15 Torr due to the reduced excited state atom density in the discharge center, which decreases the step-wise ionization rates. In addition, the effects of electron elastic scattering, i.e., Coulomb-screening-based non-isotropic scattering, total elastic (and momentum transfer) cross-section-dependent non-isotropic scattering, and momentum transfer isotropic scattering on capacitive discharges, are examined, showing that at a low pressure of 50 mTorr Coulomb-screening-based scattering underestimates the plasma density and electron power absorption by around 15%. However, isotropic scattering and cross-sect…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tps.2022.3174401

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1002/0471724254 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1063/5.0003114 · DOI
  3. 10.1063/1.352926 · DOI
  4. 10.1063/1.352251 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0009-2509(92)85133-V · DOI
  6. 10.1063/1.3368862 · DOI
  7. 10.1116/1.5135575 · DOI
  8. 10.1006/jcph.1993.1034 · DOI
  9. 10.1088/0963-0252/2/4/007 · DOI
  10. 10.1088/0963-0252/20/2/024001 · DOI
  11. 10.1088/0022-3727/37/16/002 · DOI
  12. 10.1088/1361-6463/ab9f68 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1088/1361-6595/ac1b22 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1063/1.4775084 · DOI
  15. 10.1088/1361-6595/ac3ba1 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/physreve.65.037402 · DOI
  17. 10.1088/1361-6595/ac0b55 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1088/0741-3335/47/5a/017 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/TDEI.2013.6571436 · DOI
  20. 10.1063/1.2403782 · DOI
  21. 10.1063/5.0076519 · DOI
  22. 10.1063/1.5111734 · DOI
  23. 10.1063/1.5126438 · DOI
  24. 10.1088/0963-0252/22/5/055020 · DOI
  25. 10.1088/1361-6595/ab1463 · DOI
  26. 10.1088/1361-6595/aba920 · DOI
  27. 10.1088/0963-0252/22/3/035011 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1088/1361-6595/ac0b55 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1145/369534.369540 · DOI
  30. 10.1145/272991.272995 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1088/0963-0252/23/3/035010 · DOI
  32. 10.1088/0963-0252/24/2/025017 · DOI
  33. 10.1088/1361-6595/ab17ae · DOI
  34. 10.1088/1361-6595/abf31d · DOI
  35. 10.1088/1361-6595/abe728 · DOI
  36. 10.1088/0022-3727/41/16/165202 · DOI
  37. 10.1063/1.4884225 · DOI
  38. 10.1088/1361-6595/abcc7a · DOI
  39. 10.1088/1361-6595/ac2675 · DOI
  40. 10.1088/1361-6595/abde22 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wen, D.-Q., Krek, J., Gudmundsson, J. T., Kawamura, E., Lieberman, M. A., & Verboncoeur, J. P.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Science Institute, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science
Published
2022-09
Volume
50
Issue
9
Pages
2548-2557
ISSN
  • 0093-3813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9375
OpenAlex
W4293195788
Cited by
27
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Air Force of Scientific Research (AFOSR) Multidisciplinary University Research Initiatives (FA9550-18-1-0062, FA9550-21-1-0367)
  • National Science Foundation/Department of Energy (NSF-DOE) Partnership (DE-SC0022078)
  • Icelandic Research Fund (163086, 217999)
  • AKT Display Division, Applied Materials Corporation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-Pressure Plasma Processing and Diagnostics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Vacuum and Plasma Arcs
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma Applications
Keywords
particle-in-cell/Monte Carlo collision simulation, metastable atoms, argon discharge, capacitive discharge, elastic electron scattering, plasma density profile, Coulomb screening, momentum transfer cross sections, electron power absorption, non-thermal plasma, simulation benchmarking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review