The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Vehicle-to-Grid Regulation Reserves Based on a Dynamic Simulation of Mobility Behavior
Abstract
This study establishes a new approach to analyzing the economic impacts of vehicle-to-grid (V2G) regulation reserves by simulating the restrictions arising from unpredictable mobility requests by vehicle users. A case study for Germany using average daily values (in the following also called the “static” approach) and a dynamic simulation including different mobility use patterns are presented. Comparing the dynamic approach with the static approach reveals a significant difference in the power a vehicle can offer for ancillary services and provides insights into the necessary size of vehicle pools and possible adaptations required in the regulation market to render V2G feasible. In the static approach it is shown that negative secondary control is economically the most beneficial for electric vehicles because it offers the highest potential for charging with “low-priced” energy from negative regulation reserves. A Monte Carlo simulation using stochastic mobility behavior results in a 40% reduction of the power available for regulation compared to the static approach. Because of the high value of power in the regulation market, this finding has a strong impact on the resulting revenues. Further, we demonstrate that, for the data used, a pool size of 10 000 vehicles seems reasonable to balance the variation in each individual's driving behavior. In the case of the German regulation market, which uses monthly bids, a daily or hourly bid period is recommended. This adaptation would be necessary to provide individual regulation assuming that the vehicles are primarily used for mobility reasons and cannot deliver the same amount of power every hour of the week.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Review of the Impact of Vehicle-to-Grid Technologies on Distribution Systems and Utility Interfaces
Yilmaz, M., & Krein, P. T. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2012.2227500 · Cited by 1,024
Optimal Scheduling of Vehicle-to-Grid Energy and Ancillary Services
Sortomme, E., & El-Sharkawi, M. A. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2011.2164099 · Cited by 707
Habib, S., Kamran, M., & Rashid, U. (2015) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.020 · Cited by 556
Optimal Bidding Strategy for Electric Vehicle Aggregators in Electricity Markets
Vagropoulos, S. I., & Bakirtzis, A. G. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2013.2274673 · Cited by 458
Vehicle-to-Grid Aggregator to Support Power Grid and Reduce Electric Vehicle Charging Cost
Amamra, S.-A., & Marco, J. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2958664 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Dallinger, D., Krampe, D., & Wietschel, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 302-313
- ISSN
- 1949-3053 (ISSN-L)
- 1949-3061
- OpenAlex
- W2152046486
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vehicle-to-Grid Regulation Reserves Based on a Dynamic Simulation of Mobility Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsg.2011.2131692
- The paper
- Dallinger, D., Krampe, D., & Wietschel, M. (2011). Vehicle-to-Grid Regulation Reserves Based on a Dynamic Simulation of Mobility Behavior. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2011.2131692
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.