Cited by 76Smart Grid Security and ResilienceInformation and Cyber SecurityNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection

Hidden markov models-based anomaly correlations for the cyber-physical security of ev charging stations

Girdhar, Mansi, Hong, Junho, Lee, Hyojong, Song, Tai-Jin·2022·IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid

Abstract

Over recent years, we have seen a significant rise in electric mobility to overcome the anthropogenic emissions by conventional gasoline vehicles. However, the prerequisite of smoothening of peaks and imbalances through bidirectional charging is concatenated with the undesired impacts on reliability and security of power system operation when there are probable intrusions in the eXtreme Fast Charging (XFC) station, hence destabilizing the charging networks. So this paper applies STRIDE based threat modeling to analyze and identify multiple potential threats endured by the cyber-physical system (CPS) of XFC station by using weighted attack defense tree. Potential mitigation strategies are then suggested for the identified severe threats. In addition, this paper also develops a stochastic probabilistic tool, the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) for modeling the security attacks for a given range of identified attack vectors and hence employing an appropriate defense strategy against the malicious hacker. Also, a weighted attack defense tree has been developed to generate various attack scenarios. In the end, the results of the proposed work are substantiated and validated if it is able to considerably improve overall charging efficiency and cyber-physical security of the charging station network.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsg.2021.3122106

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Girdhar et al. [128]'s HMM-based framework simultaneously analyzes cyber events and physical responses, implementing a cross-domain state correlation structure that predicts process anomalies and attack phases.

    “Their HMM-based framework simultaneously analyzes cyber events and physical responses, implementing a cross-domain state correlation structure that predicts process anomalies and attack phases.”
  • Girdhar et al. [128] used a simulated EV charging infrastructure dataset, defined key attack paths via STRIDE threat modeling and Attack-Defense Trees (ADT), and jointly observed cyber-layer communication events and physical-layer current, voltage, and temperature measurements on a unified time axis to learn state transition probabilities.

    “Using a simulated EV charging infrastructure dataset, they define key attack paths via STRIDE threat modeling and Attack-Defense Trees (ADT), and jointly observe cyber-layer communication events (e.g., DoS, MITM, data manipulation) and physical-layer current, voltage, and temperature measurements on a unified time axis to learn state transition probabilities.”
  • Girdhar et al. [128] proposed a hybrid data-fusion anomaly detection method for electric vehicle (EV) fast-charging stations (EV XFC) that models cross-domain correlations across attack stages.

    “Girdhar et al. [128] proposed a hybrid data-fusion anomaly detection method for electric vehicle (EV) fast-charging stations (EV XFC) that models cross-domain correlations across attack stages.”
  • Although Girdhar et al. [128] does not perform explicit feature-level fusion, the simultaneous tracking of cyber and physical states allows probabilistic modeling of multi-stage attacks and real-time estimation of their impact on physical system behavior.

    “Although it does not perform explicit feature-level fusion, the simultaneous tracking of cyber and physical states allows probabilistic modeling of multi-stage attacks-such as MITM, DoS, and FDI-and real-time estimation of their impact on physical system behavior.”
  • Some hybrid data fusion works couple fused anomaly scores with higher-level decision modules-such as attack-stage modeling, ATT&CK-based threat mapping, or reinforcement learning-based model selection-so that hybrid data directly drives mitigation policies and adaptive defense strategies in real time.

    “Third, some works couple fused anomaly scores with higher-level decision modules-such as attack-stage modeling, ATT&CK-based threat mapping, or reinforcement learning-based model selection-so that hybrid data directly drives mitigation policies and adaptive defense strategies in real time [128,131,132].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Girdhar, M., Hong, J., Lee, H., & Song, T.-J.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • US Hitachi Energy Research Center, Hitachi Energy, Raleigh, NC, USA
  • Chungbuk National University (KR)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
Published
2022-09
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
3903-3914
ISSN
  • 1949-3053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-3061
OpenAlex
W4205463438
Cited by
76
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 4
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid (publishedVersion)
Funders
Chungbuk National University Brain Korea (BK) 21 FOUR
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Keywords
electric vehicle charging stations, cyber-physical security, hidden Markov models, anomaly correlation, extreme fast charging, STRIDE threat modeling, attack scenarios, bidirectional charging, attack mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review