Cited by 177Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies

Electric Vehicle Battery Cycle Aging Evaluation in Real-World Daily Driving and Vehicle-to-Grid Services

Jafari, Mehdi, Gauchia, Antonio, Zhao, Shuaidong, Zhang, Kuilin, Gauchia, Lucia·2018·IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification

Abstract

In this paper, battery lifetime estimation of an electric vehicle (EV) using different driving styles on arterial roads integrating recharging scenarios in the neighborhood of the vehicle-to-grid integration is studied. The real-world driving cycles from a fleet of connected vehicles are evaluated in an EV model with different charging options. Daily utility services are added to the simulations to explore the whole day performance of the battery and its daily degradation. Fifty driving cycles from different drivers on arterial roads are classified into aggressive, mild, and gentle drivers based on their driving acceleration behavior. The standard levels 1 and 2 chargers are considered for recharging and the frequency regulation, and peak shaving and solar energy storage are assumed for the daily ancillary services. The results indicate that the aggressive driving and recharging behavior have significant effect on the battery life reduction. In addition, the daily utility services impose extra degradation of the battery. Also, the effect of temperature change on the battery degradation is explored. Simulation of active versus passive thermal management systems in three different climates shows the significant impact of the battery temperature on its capacity fade.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tte.2017.2764320

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research shows that daily 2-hour frequency regulation would consume the battery capacity by 14.3%, and adding peak shaving would take up to 35.6%.

    “Research shows that daily 2-hour frequency regulation would consume the battery capacity by 14.3%, and adding peak shaving would take up to 35.6% [42].”
  • The V2G mode can balance the load by shaving peak and filling valley according to the grid demand.

    “For example, it can balance the load by shaving peak and lling valley according to the grid demand [42].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jafari, M., Gauchia, A., Zhao, S., Zhang, K., & Gauchia, L.
Affiliations
Michigan Technological University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification
Published
2018-03
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
122-134
ISSN
2332-7782 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2765498684
Cited by
177
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (Michigan Technological University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation through the project CAREER: An Ecologically Inspired Approach to Battery Lifetime Analysis and Testing (1651256)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Keywords
battery lifetime prediction, driving style, aggressive driving, real-world driving cycles, vehicle-to-grid, frequency regulation, peak shaving, solar energy storage, battery charging, capacity fade, battery temperature, thermal management, passive thermal management, active thermal control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review