The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Market Provision of Broadcasting: A Welfare Analysis
Abstract
This paper presents a theory of the market provision of broadcasting and uses it to address the nature of market failure in the industry. Equilibrium advertising levels may be too low or too high, depending on the nuisance cost to viewers, the substitutability of programmes, and the expected benefits to advertisers from contacting viewers. The equilibrium amount of programming may also be below or above the socially optimal level. Perhaps surprisingly, the ability to price programming may reduce social surplus, while monopoly ownership may increase it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.2.i · Cited by 13,709
Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets
Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1162/154247603322493212 · Cited by 5,642
Competition in two-sided markets
Armstrong, M. (2006) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00037.x · Cited by 3,315
The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods
Cornes, R., & Sandler, T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174312 · Cited by 2,637
Chicken & Egg: Competition among Intermediation Service Providers
Caillaud, B., & Jullien, B. (2003) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1593720 · Cited by 1,799
Product Selection, Fixed Costs, and Monopolistic Competition
Spence, M. (1976) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297319 · Cited by 1,370
Free Entry and Social Inefficiency
Mankiw, N. G., & Whinston, M. D. (1986) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2555627 · Cited by 1,233
Informative Advertising with Differentiated Products
Grossman, G. M., & Shapiro, C. (1984) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297705 · Cited by 730
A Simple Theory of Advertising as a Good or Bad
Becker, G. S., & Murphy, K. M. (1993) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118455 · Cited by 728
The economic analysis of advertising
Bagwell, K. W. (2005) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.7916/d8qz2p6x · Cited by 648
Cited by
Competition in two-sided markets
Armstrong, M. (2006) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00037.x · Cited by 3,315
Two-sided markets: A progress report
Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2006) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00036.x · Cited by 2,994
Architectural Leverage: Putting Platforms in Context
Thomas, L. D. W., Autio, E., & Gann, D. M. (2014) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2011.0105 · Cited by 639
A two-sided, empirical model of television advertising and viewing markets
Wilbur, K. C. (2008) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1070.0303 · Cited by 342
Platform Performance Investment in the Presence of Network Externalities
Anderson, E. G., Parker, G. G., & Tan, B. (2014) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2013.0505 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, S. P., & Coate, S.
- Venue
- Review of Economic Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 947-972
- ISSN
- 0034-6527 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-937X
- OpenAlex
- W1975118206
- Cited by
- 622
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 61.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Market Provision of Broadcasting: A Welfare Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/0034-6527.00357
- The paper
- Anderson, S. P., & Coate, S. (2005). Market Provision of Broadcasting: A Welfare Analysis. Review of Economic Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/0034-6527.00357
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.