Cited by 52Disability Education and EmploymentEmployment and Welfare StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatment

A multi‐site randomised controlled trial of evidence‐based supported employment for adults with severe and persistent mental illness

Waghorn, Geoffrey, Dias, Shannon, Gladman, Beverley, Harris, Meredith, Saha, Sukanta·2014·Australian Occupational Therapy Journal

Abstract

Background/aim: The Individual Placement and Support (IPS) approach is an evidence‐based form of supported employment for people with severe and persistent mental illness. This approach is not yet widely available in A ustralia even though there is mounting evidence of its generalisability outside the USA. One previous Australian randomised controlled trial found that IPS is effective for young people with first episode psychosis. The aim of the current trial was to assess the effectiveness of evidence‐based supported employment when implemented for Australian adult consumers of public mental health services by utilising existing service systems. Methods: A four‐site randomised control trial design (n = 208) was conducted in Brisbane (two sites),T ownsville and C airns. The intervention consisted of an IPS supported employment service hosted by a community mental health team. The control condition was delivered at each site by mental health teams referring consumers to other disability employment services in the local area. Results: At 12 months, those in the IPS condition had 2.4 times greater odds of commencing employment than those in the control condition (42.5% vs. 23.5%). The conditions did not differ on secondary employment outcomes including job duration, hours worked, or job diversity. Attrition was higher than expected in both conditions with 28.4% completing the baseline interview but taking no further part in the study. Conclusion: The results support previous international findings that IPS‐supported employment is more effective than non‐integrated supported employment.IPS can be successfully implemented this way in Australia, but with a loss of effect strength compared to previous USA trials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1440-1630.12148

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Individual Placement and Support program yielded significant improvements in employment outcomes.

    “Specifically, the Individual Placement and Support program, where participants had regular contact with a dedicated vocational worker, yielded significant improvements in employment outcomes (Waghorn et al. 2014;Williams et al. 2015;Scanlan et al. 2019).”

    From Effect of community mental health care programs in Australia: A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Waghorn et al. 2014

  • Case management approaches can permit referrals to therapeutic support via psychologists, but this level of care is not a formalised component of case management and therefore not always facilitated.

    “Although case management approaches can permit referrals to therapeutic support via psychologists, this level of care is not a formalised component of case management and therefore not always facilitated (Waghorn et al. 2014;Williams et al. 2015).”

    From Effect of community mental health care programs in Australia: A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Waghorn et al. 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waghorn, G., Dias, S., Gladman, B., Harris, M., & Saha, S.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Park Centre for Mental Health (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Waghorn, Geoffrey
Venue
Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-10-04
Volume
61
Issue
6
Pages
424-436
ISSN
  • 0045-0766 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1630
OpenAlex
W2153599919
Cited by
52
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3
FWCI
16.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian Occupational Therapy Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
Queensland Health via Counclil of Australian Governments
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
Individual Placement and Support, supported employment, severe and persistent mental illness, community mental health services, employment effects, disability employment services, attrition, Australia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Molecular Sequence Data, Patient Dropouts, Queensland, Employment, Supported, Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Evidence-Based Practice, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review