Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 580

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vertical mother–neonate transfer of maternal gut bacteria via breastfeeding

Open access
Jost, Ted, Lacroix, Christophe, Braegger, Christian P., Rochat, Florence, Chassard, Christophe·2014·Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: Breast milk has recently been recognized as source of commensal and potential probiotic bacteria. The present study investigated whether viable strains of gut‐associated obligate anaerobes are shared between the maternal and neonatal gut ecosystem via breastfeeding. Maternal faeces, breast milk and corresponding neonatal faeces collected from seven mothers‐neonate pairs at three neonatal sampling points were analyzed by culture‐independent (pyrosequencing) and culture‐dependent methods (16 S rRNA gene sequencing, pulsed field gel electrophoresis, random amplified polymorphic DNA and repetitive extragenic palindromic polymerase chain reaction. Pyrosequencing allowed identifying gut‐associated obligate anaerobic genera, like B ifidobacterium , B acteroides , P arabacteroides and members of the C lostridia ( B lautia , C lostridium , C ollinsella and V eillonella ) shared between maternal faeces, breast milk and neonatal faeces. Using culture, a viable strain of B ifidobacterium breve was shown to be shared between all three ecosystems within one mother–neonate pair. Furthermore, pyrosequencing revealed that several butyrate‐producing members of the C lostridia ( C oprococcus , F aecalibacterium , R oseburia and S ubdoligranulum ) were shared between maternal faeces and breast milk. This study shows that (viable) obligate gut‐associated anaerobes may be vertically transferred from mother to neonate via breastfeeding. Thus, our data support the recently suggested hypothesis of a novel way of mother–neonate communication, in which maternal gut bacteria reach breast milk via an entero‐mammary pathway to influence neonatal gut colonization and maturation of the immune system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1462-2920.12238

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 580

Metadata

Authors
Jost, T., Lacroix, C., Braegger, C. P., Rochat, F., & Chassard, C.
Venue
Environmental Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-09-03
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
2891-2904
ISSN
  • 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-2920
OpenAlex
W2133167298
Cited by
580
References
4
FWCI
20.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.