The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Groups, Teams, and Creativity: The Creative Potential of Idea‐generating Groups
Abstract
On voit apparaitre une nouvelle litte´rature traitant de la cre´ativite´ et de l’innovation dans les groupes et les e´quipes. Bien que de nombreaux facteurs inhibent la cre´ativite´ des groupes, nos investigations et analyses indiquent que l’interaction dans les groupes et e´quipes serait une source fe´conde d’innovations et d’ide´es cre´atives. On pre´sente dans cet article un mode`le the´orique de la cre´ativite´ dans les groupes producteurs d’ide´es et l’impact sur le travail en e´quipe et les recherches a` venir. There is an emerging literature on group and team creativity and innovation. Although there are many factors that appear to inhibit creativity in groups, our review and analysis suggests that interaction in groups and teams can be an important source of creative ideas and innovations. A theoretical model of creativity in idea‐generating groups is developed and implications for teamwork and future research are presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The associative basis of the creative process.
Mednick, S. (1962) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0048850 · Cited by 4,140
What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639702300303 · Cited by 3,526
Cited by
Anderson, N., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2004) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.236 · Cited by 1,035
Future work design research and practice: Towards an elaborated model of work design
Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D., & Cordery, J. L. (2001) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317901167460 · Cited by 617
A Review and Integration of Team Composition Models: Moving Toward a Dynamic and Temporal Framework
Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Donsbach, J. S., & Alliger, G. M. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206313503014 · Cited by 408
How, when, and why bad apples spoil the barrel: negative group members and dysfunctional groups
Felps, W., Mitchell, T. R., & Byington, E. (2006) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(06)27005-9 · Cited by 395
Location-Level Links between Diversity and Innovative Climate Depend on National Power Distance
van der Vegt, G. S., Van de Vliert, E., & Huang, X. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.19573116 · Cited by 228
Creativity in Virtual Work: Effects of Demographic Differences
Martins, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2011) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496410397382 · Cited by 80
Hendriks, A.-M., Jansen, M. W., Gubbels, J. S., De Vries, N. K., Paulussen, T., & Kremers, S. P. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-46 · Cited by 68
How and why people synchronize: An integrated perspective
daSilva, E. B., & Wood, A. (2025) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683241252036 · Cited by 56
Structuring group decision making in a web-based environment by using the nominal group technique
Lago, P. P., Beruvides, M. G., Jian, J.-Y., Canto, A. M., Sandoval, A., & Taraban, R. (2007) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2006.11.003 · Cited by 46
Bridging the Disciplinary Divide: Co-Creating Research Ideas in eScience Teams
Pennington, D. D. (2011) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-011-9134-2 · Cited by 35
Tang, M., Hofreiter, S., Werner, C. H., Zielińska, A., & Karwowski, M. (2025) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.1519 · Cited by 32
CreAItive Collaboration? Users' Misjudgment of AI-Creativity Affects Their Collaborative Performance
Bangerl, M. M., Disch, L., David, T., & Pammer-Schindler, V. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713886 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Paulus, P.
- Venue
- Applied Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 237-262
- ISSN
- 0269-994X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0597
- OpenAlex
- W2014615663
- Cited by
- 672
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
