The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An International Study of the Psychometric Properties of the Hofstede Values Survey Module 1994: A Comparison of Individual and Country/Province Level Results
Abstract
Hofstede’s Values Survey Module has been the basis for much cross‐cultural and cross‐national research in the workplace, but little information about its psychometric properties has been available. This study provides internal consistency (coefficient alpha) statistics from samples representing 23 nations/provinces. Across both English and translated versions, internal consistencies tended to be poor, and in the majority of cases failed to achieve even a liberal criterion of 0.60. Even when data were aggregated by sample coefficient alphas were poor for all but long‐term orientation. At the participant level, long‐term orientation and individualism had marginal internal consistencies, whereas power distance, masculinity, and uncertainty avoidance subscales had inadequate internal consistencies. A replication of Hofstede’s ecological factor analysis failed to support the five subscales. It is suggested that the construct validity of these scales is suspect, and that they should be used with caution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept
Hofstede, G. (1984) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1984.4279653 · Cited by 1,257
Cited by
Taras, V., Kirkman, B. L., & Steel, P. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0018938 · Cited by 1,160
Yoo, B., Donthu, N., & Lenartowicz, T. (2011) · Journal of International Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1080/08961530.2011.578059 · Cited by 916
SPECTOR, P. E., ALLEN, T. D., POELMANS, S. A. Y., LAPIERRE, L. M., COOPER, C. L., MICHAEL, O., SANCHEZ, J. I., ABARCA, N., ALEXANDROVA, M., BEHAM, B., et al. (2007) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00092.x · Cited by 478
Self-citationMethodological and Substantive Issues in Conducting Multinational and Cross-Cultural Research
Spector, P. E., Liu, C., & Sanchez, J. I. (2015) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111310 · Cited by 82
Self-citationMa, Y., & Turel, O. (2019) · Cognition, Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-018-0503-1 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., & Sparks, K.
- Venue
- Applied Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 269-281
- ISSN
- 0269-994X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0597
- OpenAlex
- W2148043668
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An International Study of the Psychometric Properties of the Hofstede Values Survey Module 1994: A Comparison of Individual and Country/Province Level Results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1464-0597.00058
- The paper
- Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., & Sparks, K. (2001). An International Study of the Psychometric Properties of the Hofstede Values Survey Module 1994: A Comparison of Individual and Country/Province Level Results. Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00058
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.