The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery
Abstract
We examine the interface between for‐profit and publicly funded research in pharmaceuticals. Firms access upstream basic research through investments in absorptive capacity in the form of in‐house basic research and ‘pro‐publication’ internal incentives. Some firms also maintain extensive connections to the wider scientific community, which we measure using data on coauthorship of scientific papers between pharmaceutical company scientists and publicly funded researchers. ‘Connectedness’ is significantly correlated with firms’ internal organization, as well as their performance in drug discovery. The estimated impact of ‘connectedness’ on private research productivity implies a substantial return to public investments in basic research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2233763 · Cited by 7,530
Cited by
Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2002.6587995 · Cited by 10,758
Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration
Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006 · Cited by 1,400
McFadyen, M. A., & Cannella, A. A. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159615 · Cited by 1,039
Eggers, J. P., & Kaplan, S. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0401 · Cited by 774
Azoulay, P., Zivin, J. S. G., & Wang, J. (2010) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2010.125.2.549 · Cited by 720
The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration
Ponds, R., Van Oort, F., & Frenken, K. (2007) · Papers in Regional Science · doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00126.x · Cited by 645
Public R&D Investments and Private-sector Patenting: Evidence from NIH Funding Rules
Azoulay, P., Graff Zivin, J. S., Li, D., & Sampat, B. N. (2019) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdy034 · Cited by 349
Arm’s Length Financing and Innovation: Evidence from Publicly Traded Firms
Atanassov, J. (2016) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2097 · Cited by 157
Chen, Y., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Du, J. (2016) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12162 · Cited by 144
Santoro, G., Vrontis, D., & Pastore, A. (2017) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-02-2017-0120 · Cited by 133
Developing Absorptive Capacity in Mature Organizations: The Change Agent’s Role
Jones, O. (2006) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507606067172 · Cited by 124
Research excellence and university-industry collaboration in UK science parks
Minguillo, D., & Thelwall, M. (2015) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.1093/reseval/rvu032 · Cited by 30
Beierlein, J. M., McNamee, L. M., Walsh, M. J., Kaitin, K. I., DiMasi, J. A., & Ledley, F. D. (2017) · Clinical Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.06.001 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Cockburn, I. M., & Henderson, R. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Industrial Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-182
- ISSN
- 0022-1821 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6451
- OpenAlex
- W1992988808
- Cited by
- 1,197
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 37.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
