Cited by 774Innovation and Knowledge ManagementOrganizational Management and LeadershipManagement and Organizational Studies

Cognition and Renewal: Comparing CEO and Organizational Effects on Incumbent Adaptation to Technical Change

Eggers, J. P., Kaplan, Sarah·2009·Organization Science

Abstract

We investigate the conditions under which managerial cognition affects the timing of incumbent entry into a radical new technological market. We address this question using a longitudinal study of communications technology firms entering the fiber-optics product market. Using a hazard rate model, we investigate the relevance of cognition based on the direction of CEO attention. We find that attention toward the emerging technology and the affected industry is associated with faster entry, and attention to existing technologies is associated with slower progress. Second, we assess the extent to which the effect of cognition is dependent upon the levels of relevant organizational factors and find that CEO attention to the emerging technology may amplify the effects of industry orientation. Managerial cognition is important in understanding organizational outcomes, and considering both the direction of cognition and its interaction with organizational factors provides a more nuanced view of entry behavior. These results contribute to the literatures on incumbent response to technical change and new product development by suggesting that context-specific managerial cognition has a separate and important influence on the degree and direction of strategic renewal. We argue that managerial cognition is therefore a dynamic managerial capability that can shape adaptation by established firms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/orsc.1080.0401

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fast-paced technological advancements provide late entrants with the possibility of using superior technology to design products that outperform those of early entrants.

    “Moreover, fast-paced technological advancements provide late entrants with the possibility of using superior technology to design products that outperform those of early entrants (Eggers and Kaplan 2009).”

    From Smart Timing for Smart Products? Complementor Multihoming in Nascent Platform Markets (2026) · cites this paper as Eggers and Kaplan 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eggers, J. P., & Kaplan, S.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Organization Science
Published
2009-04
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
461-477
ISSN
  • 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5455
OpenAlex
W2141155750
Cited by
774
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 78 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 23
FWCI
30.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Organization Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Organizational Management and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
managerial cognition, incumbent firms, technological change, market entry timing, industry orientation, strategic renewal, new product development, management skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review