The DOI matches its Crossref record.
General Traits of Personality and Affectivity as Predictors of Satisfaction in Intimate Relationships: Evidence from Self‐ and Partner‐Ratings
Open accessAbstract
Self‐ and partner‐ratings on trait affect and the Big Five were obtained from 74 married and 136 dating couples. The relationship satisfaction of each person (the ‘target’) was correlated with four sets of ratings: (a) target’s self‐rated personality, (b) target’s partner‐rated personality, (c) partner’s self‐rated personality, and (d) partner’s target‐rated personality. Self‐ and partner‐ratings of the target’s personality yielded very similar results. Negative and positive affectivity were consistent predictors of satisfaction in both samples. Conscientiousness and agreeableness were reliably related to satisfaction in the dating couples, whereas extraversion consistently correlated with satisfaction in the married couples. These traits jointly predicted as much as 34% (self‐ratings) and 26% (partner‐ratings) of the variance in satisfaction. In contrast, the partner’s personality played a lesser role in satisfaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Personality Development: Stability and Change
Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141913 · Cited by 2,699
Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x · Cited by 2,361
Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being.
Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138 · Cited by 1,794
Personality-relationship transaction in young adulthood.
Neyer, F. J., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.6.1190 · Cited by 518
Noftle, E. E., & Shaver, P. R. (2006) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2004.11.003 · Cited by 501
Suppression and expression of emotion in social and interpersonal outcomes: A meta-analysis.
Chervonsky, E., & Hunt, C. (2017) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000270 · Cited by 203
Ramsey, M. A., & Gentzler, A. L. (2015) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2015.01.003 · Cited by 185
Trait emotional intelligence, conflict communication patterns, and relationship satisfaction
Smith, L., Heaven, P. C. L., & Ciarrochi, J. (2008) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.11.024 · Cited by 165
Soto, C. J. (2021) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550619900572 · Cited by 90
Gebauer, J. E., Leary, M. R., & Neberich, W. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167212456300 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Watson, D., Hubbard, B., & Wiese, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 413-449
- ISSN
- 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6494
- OpenAlex
- W2069704569
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
