CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 297Academic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyCultural Differences and ValuesPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Filipino psychology): A legacy of Virgilio G. Enriquez

Open access
Pe‐Pua, Rogelia, Protacio‐Marcelino, Elizabeth A.·2000·Asian Journal of Social Psychology
DOI 10.1111/1467-839x.00054
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Filipino psychology) refers to the psychology born out of the experience, thought and orientation of the Filipinos, based on the full use of Filipino culture and language. The approach is one of “indigenization from within” whereby the theoretical framework and methodology emerge from the experiences of the people from the indigenous culture. It is based on assessing historical and socio‐cultural realities, understanding the local language, unraveling Filipino characteristics, and explaining them through the eyes of the native Filipino. Among the outcomes are: a body of knowledge including indigenous concepts, development of indigenous research methods and indigenous personality testing, new directions in teaching psychology, and an active participation in organisations among Filipino psychologists and social scientists, both in the Philippines and overseas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-839x.00054

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Bonifacio, A. (1976). Hinggil sa kaisipang Pilipino (On Filipino thought). In L.F. Antonio, E.S. Reyes, R.E. Pe and N.R. Almonte (Eds.), Ulat ng Unang Pambansang Kumperensya sa Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Proceedings of the First National Conference on Filipino Psychology) (pp. 24-48). Quezon City: Pambansang Samahan sa Sikolohiyang Pilipino.
  2. Bostrom, L.C. (1968). Filipino Bahala na and American fatalism. Silliman University Journal, 51, 399-413.
  3. Carlota, A.J. (1980). Research tends in psychological testing. In A. Carlota and L. Lazo (Eds.), Psychological Measurement: A Book of Readings (pp. 31-47). Quezon City: U.P. Psychology Foundation, 1987.
  4. Cipres-Ortega, S. and Guanzon-Lapen ˜a, M.A. (1997). Locally developed psychological tests: A critical review. Paper presented at the Annual Scientific Meeting of the National Academy of Science and Technology, Manila, July 10, 1997.
  5. De la Torre, E. (1995). The valuing process among caregivers. In L. Teodoro and P. Sicam (Eds.), Torture Survivors and Caregivers: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Therapy and Research Issues (pp. 117-128). Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.
  6. Enriquez, V.G. (1975). Mga batayan ng Sikolohiyang Pilipino sa kultura at kasaysayan (The bases of Filipino psychology in culture and history). General Education Journal, 29, 61-88.
  7. Enriquez, V.G. (1976). Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Perspektibo at direksyon (Filipino psychology: perspective and directioon). In L.F. Antonio, E.S. Reyes, R.E. Pe and N.R. Almonte (Eds.), Ulat ng Unang Pambansang Kumperensya sa Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Proceedings of the First National Conference on Filipino Psychology) (pp. 221-243). Quezon City: Pambasang Samahan sa Sikolohiyang Pilipino.
  8. Enriquez, V.G. (1977). Pakikisama o pakikibaka: Understanding the psychology of the Filipino. Paper read at the Conference on Philippine Culture, Bay Area Bilingual Education League, Berkeley, CA.
  9. Enriquez, V.G. (1985). The development of psychological thought in the Philippines. In A. Aganon and M. David (Eds.), Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Isyu, Pananaw at Kaalaman (New Directions in Center for Integrative and Development Studies.
  10. Lynch, F. (1961). Social acceptance. In F. Lynch (Ed.), Four Readings on Philippine Values (pp. 1- 21). Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
  11. Lynch, F. (1973). Social acceptance reconsidered. In F. Lynch and A. de Guzman II (Eds.), IPC Papers No. 2. Four Readings on Philippine Values (pp. 1-68). Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University.
  12. Margallo, S. (1982). The challenge of making a scientific indigenous field research: An evaluation of studies using maka-Pilipinong pananaliksik (Filipino-oriented research). In R. Pe-Pua (Ed.), Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Teorya, Metodo at Gamit (Filipino Psychology: Theory, Method and Application) (pp. 233-239). Quezon City: Surian ng Sikolohiyang Pilipino.
  13. Nery, L. (1979). Pakikisama as a method: A study of a subculture. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 12 (1), 27-32.
  14. Pe-Pua, R. (1991). UP pioneers in indigenous Filipino psychology. In B. Aquino (Ed.), The University Experience (pp. 152-164). Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.
  15. Protacio-Marcelino, E. (1996). Identidad at Etnisidad: Pananaw at Karanasan ng mga Estudyanteng Filipino-Amerikano sa California (Identity and Ethnicity: Perspectives and Experiences of Filipino- American Students in California). Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation in Psychology, University of the Philippines, Quezon City, Philippines.
  16. Salazar, Z. (1981). Wika at diwa: Isang panglinggwistikang analisis sa halimbawa ng konsepto ng ''hiya'' (Language and consciousness: An illustrative psycholinguistic analysis of the concept of ''hiya''). In S. Cipres-Ortega (Ed.), Ulat ng Ikalabindalawang Seminar sa Sikolohiya ng Wika (Proceedings of the 12th Seminar on the Psychology of Language) (pp. 38-43). Quezon City: Unibersidad ng Pilipinas.
  17. Salazar, Z. (1985a). Four filiations in Philippine psychological thought. In A. Aganon and M. David (Eds.), Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Isyu, Pananaw at Kaalaman (New Directions in Indigenous Psychology) (pp. 194-214). Manila: National Book Store.
  18. Salazar, Z. (1985b) Hiya: Panlapi at salita (Hiya: Affixations and word). In A. Aganon and M. David (Eds.), Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Isyu, Pananaw at Kaalaman (New Directions in Indigenous Psychology) (pp. 288-296). Manila: National Book Store.
  19. Salazar, Z. (1991). Ang pantayong pananaw bilang dikursong pangkabihasnan (The pantayo perspective as cultural discourse). In V. Bautista and R. Pe-Pua (Eds.), Pilipinolohiya: Kasaysayan, Pilosopiya at Pananaliksik (Philippine Studies: History, Philosophy and Research). Manila: Kalikasan Press.
  20. San Juan, J. and Soriaga, R. (1985). Panunuluyan: Mula paninimbang hanggang malalimang pakikipagpalagayang-loob (Panunuluyan: Interaction techniques and levels of relationship). In A. Aganon and M. David (Eds.), Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Isyu, Pananaw at Kaalaman (New Directions in Indigenous Psychology) (pp. 433-480). Manila: National Book Store.
  21. Santiago, C.E. (1975). Ang kahulugan ng pagkalalake sa mga Pilipino (The meaning of 'masculinity' among Filipinos). In V.G. Enriquez (Ed.), Serye ng mga Papel sa Pagkataong Pilipino (Series of Papers in Filipino Personality) (pp. 51-70). Lunsod Quezon: Philippine Psychology Research House.
  22. Santiago, C.E. (1977). Pakapa-kapa: Paglilinaw ng isang konsepto sa nayon (Pakapa-kapa: Clarifying a concept in a rural setting). In R. Pe-Pua (Ed.), Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Teorya, Metodo at Gamit (Filipino Psychology: Theory, Method and Application) (pp. 161-170). Quezon City: Surian ng Sikolohiyang Pilipino.
  23. Santiago, C.E. and Enriquez, V.G. (1976). Tungo sa makapilipinong pananaliksik (Towards a Filipino- oriented research). Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Mga piling Papel, 1 (4), 3-10.
  24. Torres, A. (1982). ''Pakapa-kapa'' as an approach in Philippine Psychology. In R. Pe-Pua (Ed.), Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Teorya, Metodo at Gamit (Filipino Psychology: Theory, Method and Application) (pp. 171-174). Quezon City: Surian ng Sikolohiyang Pilipino.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Pe‐Pua, R., & Protacio‐Marcelino, E. A.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Asian Journal of Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-04
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
49-71
ISSN
  • 1367-2223 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-839X
DOI
10.1111/1467-839x.00054
OpenAlex
W2052067108
Cited by
297
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 991 d)
Locations
Asian Journal Of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ateneo de Manila University
  • University of the Philippines
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
Filipino psychology, indigenization, indigenous concepts, Indigenous research methods, personality tests, psychology education, Philippine culture, history of psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review