Cited by 207Resilience and Mental HealthChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Abuse and Trauma

Caregiving and developmental factors differentiating young at-risk urban children showing resilient versus stress-affected outcomes: A replication and extension

Wyman, Peter A, Cowen, Emory L, Work, William C, Hoyt-Meyers, Lynne, Magnus, Keith B, Fagen, Douglas B·1999·Child Development

Abstract

This study tested hypotheses from an organizational-developmental model for childhood resilience. In this model resilience reflects a child's mastery of age-salient objectives, in the face of substantial adversity, by drawing on internal and external resources that enhance processes of adaptation specific to each developmental stage. Interviews were conducted with parents of 122 7- to 9-year-old urban children exposed to multiple risk factors, 69 classified as resilient and 53 as maladjusted. Consistent with predictions generated by the model: (1) characteristics of a child's caregiving system and early development differentiated children with resilient and stress-affected adaptations; and (2) variables reflecting emotionally responsive, competent parenting were direct, proximal predictors of resilient status and mediators of other caregiver resources such as education, mental health, and relational history. Identified predictors of resilient status, including competent parenting and caregiver psychosocial resources, largely replicated findings from a prior study with sociodemographically comparable 9- to 12-year-old children.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-8624.00047

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High-quality caregiving moderates the effects of poverty on child development outcomes.

    “And numerous studies have shown high-quality caregiving to moderate the effects of poverty on child development outcomes (e.g., Ramey & Campbell, 1991; Wyman et al., 1999).”

    From Stress and the development of self-regulation in context (2010) · cites this paper as Wyman et al., 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wyman, P. A., Cowen, E. L., Work, W. C., Hoyt-Meyers, L., Magnus, K. B., & Fagen, D. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
  • Oswego Hospital , Oswego, NY
  • Hamilton Center , Terre Haute, IN
  • Sheppard and Enoch Pratt Hospital (US)
Venue
Child Development
Published
1999-05-01
Volume
70
Issue
3
Pages
645-659
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2056312847
Cited by
207
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
child resilience, vulnerable children, urban children, parenting, caregiver resources, emotional responsiveness, child maladjustment, developmental factors, adversity
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Child, Child Development, Child Rearing, Family Health, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Parents, Retrospective Studies, Socioeconomic Factors, Statistics as Topic, Stress, Psychological, Urban Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review