Cited by 174Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentLanguage Development and DisordersCognitive Abilities and Testing

The Developmental Course of Habituation in Infancy and Preschool Outcome

Colombo, John, Shaddy, D. Jill, Richman, W. Allen, Maikranz, Julie M., Blaga, Otilia M.·2004·Infancy

Abstract

A longitudinal sample of 226 infants were tested monthly on habituation and novelty preference tasks, augmented with simultaneous heart rate recording from 3 to 9 months of age. Infants were then administered the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II (BSID) and MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory (MCDI) at 12, 18, and 24 months. Prior findings regarding the decline in look duration with age were replicated. Age‐based factors were extracted from the monthly assessments, an early attention factor from 3 to 6 months and a late attention factor from 7 to 9 months. A novelty preference factor, which grouped recognition performance at 4 and 6 months of age, was also derived. The late attention factor correlated negatively with a factor score derived from the BSID mental index, and the novelty preference aggregate was correlated positively with a factor score derived from the MCDI production scores. Two clusters of infants were derived based on the developmental course of change from the early attention to late attention look duration aggregates: One cluster (n= 150) decreased strongly, and another (n= 50) increased. Infants belonging to these clusters subsequently differed on both the BSID and MCDI outcomes, with the former cluster showing distinct advantages that increased as the outcome assessments progressed from 12 to 24 months of age. This finding was bolstered by subsequent analyses of data from infants who completed all tests run from 3 to 9 months. The results of this study suggest that the developmental course of attention during infancy is an important clue to cognitive and language outcomes in early childhood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327078in0501_1

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colombo, J., Shaddy, D. J., Richman, W. A., Maikranz, J. M., & Blaga, O. M.
Affiliations
University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Colombo, John
Venue
Infancy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
1-38
ISSN
  • 1525-0008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7078
OpenAlex
W2098549639
Cited by
174
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Infancy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
habituation, novelty preference, infant attention, heart rate, infant development, cognitive outcomes, language outcomes, Bayley Scales of Infant Development, MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory, developmental trajectories, early childhood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review