Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 763

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Stability of Personality: Observations and Evaluations

McCrae, Robert R., Costa, Paul T.·1994·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

In this brief passage, Emerson an ticipated modern findings about the stability of personality and pointed out an illusion to which both layper sons and psychologists are prone. He was also perhaps the first to de cry personality stability as the enemy of freedom, creativity, and growth, objecting that temperament puts all divinity to rout. In this article, we summarize evidence in support of Emerson's observations but offer ar guments against his evaluation of them.2

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770693

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 763

Metadata

Authors
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T.
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
1994-12
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
173-175
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W1986137293
Cited by
763
References
0
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Stability of Personality: Observations and Evaluations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770693
The paper
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1994). The Stability of Personality: Observations and Evaluations. Current Directions in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770693

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.