Cited by 472Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

A system for relational reasoning in human prefrontal cortex

Waltz, James A., Knowlton, Barbara J., Holyoak, Keith J., Boone, Kyle B., Mishkin, Fred S., de Menezes Santos, Marcia, Thomas, Carmen R., Miller, Bruce L.·1999·Psychological Science

Abstract

The integration of multiple relations between mental representations is critical for higher level cognition. For both deductive- and inductive-reasoning tasks, patients with prefrontal damage exhibited a selective and catastrophic deficit in the integration of relations, whereas patients with anterior temporal lobe damage, matched for overall IQ but with intact prefrontal cortex, exhibited normal relational integration. In contrast, prefrontal patients performed more accurately than temporal patients on tests of both episodic memory and semantic knowledge. These double dissociations suggest that integration of relations is a specific source of cognitive complexity for which intact prefrontal cortex is essential. The integration of relations may be the fundamental common factor linking the diverse abilities that depend on prefrontal function, such as planning, problem solving, and fluid intelligence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9280.00118

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waltz, J. A., Knowlton, B. J., Holyoak, K. J., Boone, K. B., Mishkin, F. S., de Menezes Santos, M., Thomas, C. R., & Miller, B. L.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
1999-03
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
119-125
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2154446803
Cited by
472
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 25
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
relational reasoning, prefrontal cortex, anterior temporal lobe, double dissociation, deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, episodic memory, semantic knowledge, fluid intelligence, planning, problem solving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review