The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Expertise Training with Novel Objects Leads to Left-Lateralized Facelike Electrophysiological Responses
Open accessAbstract
Scalp event-related potentials (ERPs) in humans indicate that face and object processing differ approximately 170 ms following stimulus presentation, at the point of the N170 occipitotemporal component. The N170 is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects. We tested whether this inversion effect reflects early mechanisms exclusive to faces or whether it generalizes to other stimuli as a function of visual expertise. ERPs to upright and inverted faces and novel objects (Greebles) were recorded in 10 participants before and after 2 weeks of expertise training with Greebles. The N170 component was observed for both faces and Greebles. The results are consistent with previous reports in that the N170 was delayed and enhanced for inverted faces at recording sites in both hemispheres. For Greebles, the same effect of inversion was observed only for experts, primarily in the left hemisphere. These results suggest that the mechanisms underlying the electrophysiological face-inversion effect extend to visually homogeneous nonface object categories, at least in the left hemisphere, but only when such mechanisms are recruited by expertise.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans
Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., Perez, E., & McCarthy, G. (1996) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551 · Cited by 3,076
Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition
Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640749308401045 · Cited by 2,187
Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise.
Diamond, R., & Carey, S. E. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.115.2.107 · Cited by 1,584
Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition
Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/72140 · Cited by 1,418 · cited 4×
“This is consistent with prior studies using behavioral (Diamond & Carey, 1986; Gauthier & Tarr, 1997; Gauthier et al., 1998) and fMRI (Gauthier et al., 1999, 2000) responses that were once also presumed to be specific to faces but have since been obtained in a variety of experts (e.g., people expert…”
InfluentialWhy faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise.
Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.2.107 · Cited by 1,301
Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects
Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Anderson, A. W., Skudlarski, P., & Gore, J. C. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/9224 · Cited by 1,188
Self-citationEvent-related potential studies of attention
Luck, S. J., Woodman, G. F., & Vogel, E. K. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01545-x · Cited by 1,142
Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition
GAUTHIER, I., & TARR, M. J. (1997) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(96)00286-6 · Cited by 1,017
Self-citationDomain specificity in face perception
Kanwisher, N. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/77664 · Cited by 968
Rossion, B., Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Despland, P., Bruyer, R., Linotte, S., & Crommelinck, M. (2000) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200001170-00014 · Cited by 738
Self-citation
Cited by
The many faces of configural processing
Maurer, D., Grand, R. L., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01903-4 · Cited by 2,110
Schultz, R. T. (2005) · International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2004.12.012 · Cited by 1,071
N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal Differences between Object and Face Processing Using ERPs
Itier, R. J. (2004) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhg111 · Cited by 668
Tanaka, J. W., Curran, T., Porterfield, A. L., & Collins, D. (2006) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1488 · Cited by 389
Grelotti, D. J., Gauthier, I., & Schultz, R. T. (2002) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.10028 · Cited by 386
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rossion, B., Gauthier, I., Goffaux, V., Tarr, M. J., & Crommelinck, M.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 250-257
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2160153449
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 7.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expertise Training with Novel Objects Leads to Left-Lateralized Facelike Electrophysiological Responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9280.00446
- The paper
- Rossion, B., Gauthier, I., Goffaux, V., Tarr, M. J., & Crommelinck, M. (2002). Expertise Training with Novel Objects Leads to Left-Lateralized Facelike Electrophysiological Responses. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00446
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
