Cited by 595EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLinguistics and Language Analysis

Learner Uptake in Communicative ESL Lessons

Ellis, Rod, Basturkmen, Helen, Loewen, Shawn·2001·Language Learning

Abstract

This article examines incidental and transitory focus on form. Learner uptake was studied in focus‐on‐form episodes occurring in 12 hours of communicative ESL teaching. Learner uptake was generally high and successful—to a much greater extent than has been reported for immersion classrooms. Uptake was higher and more successful in reactive focus on form and in student‐initiated focus on form than in teacher‐initiated focus on form. The level of uptake was also influenced by whether meaning or form was negotiated and by the complexity of an episode. This study indicates that focus on form can occur without disturbing the communicative flow of a classroom and that the classroom context can affect the amount of uptake.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9922.00156

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ellis, Basturkmen and Loewen (2001) distinguished pre-emptive and reactive form-focused episodes occurring in task-based lessons.

    “Ellis, Basturkmen and Loewen (2001) distinguished pre-emptive and reactive form-focused episodes (FFEs) that occurred in task-based lessons.”

    From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as Ellis, Basturkmen and Loewen (2001)

  • Successful uptake was more likely to occur in learner-initiated pre-emptive and in reactive form-focused episodes than in teacher-initiated pre-emptive episodes.

    “They reported that successful uptake was more likely to occur in learner-initiated pre-emptive and in reactive FFEs than in teacher-initiated pre-emptive FFEs.”

    From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as Ellis, Basturkmen and Loewen (2001)

  • Even speaking tasks can be carried out through teacher-class interaction.

    “Even speaking tasks can be conducted through teacher-class interaction, as illustrated in Ellis, Basturkmen and Loewen (2001) and Loewen (2005).”

    From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as Ellis, Basturkmen and Loewen (2001)

  • Other researchers have noted that the same kinds of interactional sequences can occur in a classroom where there is negotiation of form, that is, negotiation occurs even though there is no communication problem.

    “Other researchers (e.g.Lyster 2001;Ellis, Basturkmen & Loewen 2001), however, have noted that the same kinds of interactional sequences can occur in a classroom where there is negotiation of form (i.e.negotiation occurs even though there is no communication problem).”

    From Focus on form: A critical review (2016) · cites this paper as Ellis, Basturkmen & Loewen 2001

  • Teachers sometimes pre-empt a problem, for example by reminding students to pay attention to a particular grammatical feature when they perform a task, and learners sometimes pre-empt as when they initiate questions about linguistic forms.

    “As Ellis, Basturkmen & Loewen (2001) noted in their study of focus on form episodes in communicative ESL classes, there are occasions when teachers pre-empt a problem, for example, by reminding students they need to pay attention to a particular grammatical feature when they perform a task and learners also sometimes pre-empt as when they initiate questions about linguistic forms.”

    From Focus on form: A critical review (2016) · cites this paper as Ellis, Basturkmen & Loewen (2001)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Venue
Language Learning
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-06
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
281-318
ISSN
  • 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9922
OpenAlex
W2128928398
Cited by
595
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 36
FWCI
84.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Language Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
Keywords
learner uptake, form-focused instruction, communicative language teaching, English as a second language, negotiation of meaning, classroom context

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review