Learner Uptake in Communicative ESL Lessons
Abstract
This article examines incidental and transitory focus on form. Learner uptake was studied in focus‐on‐form episodes occurring in 12 hours of communicative ESL teaching. Learner uptake was generally high and successful—to a much greater extent than has been reported for immersion classrooms. Uptake was higher and more successful in reactive focus on form and in student‐initiated focus on form than in teacher‐initiated focus on form. The level of uptake was also influenced by whether meaning or form was negotiated and by the complexity of an episode. This study indicates that focus on form can occur without disturbing the communicative flow of a classroom and that the classroom context can affect the amount of uptake.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ellis, Basturkmen and Loewen (2001) distinguished pre-emptive and reactive form-focused episodes occurring in task-based lessons.
“Ellis, Basturkmen and Loewen (2001) distinguished pre-emptive and reactive form-focused episodes (FFEs) that occurred in task-based lessons.”
From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as Ellis, Basturkmen and Loewen (2001)
Successful uptake was more likely to occur in learner-initiated pre-emptive and in reactive form-focused episodes than in teacher-initiated pre-emptive episodes.
“They reported that successful uptake was more likely to occur in learner-initiated pre-emptive and in reactive FFEs than in teacher-initiated pre-emptive FFEs.”
From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as Ellis, Basturkmen and Loewen (2001)
Even speaking tasks can be carried out through teacher-class interaction.
“Even speaking tasks can be conducted through teacher-class interaction, as illustrated in Ellis, Basturkmen and Loewen (2001) and Loewen (2005).”
From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as Ellis, Basturkmen and Loewen (2001)
Other researchers have noted that the same kinds of interactional sequences can occur in a classroom where there is negotiation of form, that is, negotiation occurs even though there is no communication problem.
“Other researchers (e.g.Lyster 2001;Ellis, Basturkmen & Loewen 2001), however, have noted that the same kinds of interactional sequences can occur in a classroom where there is negotiation of form (i.e.negotiation occurs even though there is no communication problem).”
From Focus on form: A critical review (2016) · cites this paper as Ellis, Basturkmen & Loewen 2001
Teachers sometimes pre-empt a problem, for example by reminding students to pay attention to a particular grammatical feature when they perform a task, and learners sometimes pre-empt as when they initiate questions about linguistic forms.
“As Ellis, Basturkmen & Loewen (2001) noted in their study of focus on form episodes in communicative ESL classes, there are occasions when teachers pre-empt a problem, for example, by reminding students they need to pay attention to a particular grammatical feature when they perform a task and learners also sometimes pre-empt as when they initiate questions about linguistic forms.”
From Focus on form: A critical review (2016) · cites this paper as Ellis, Basturkmen & Loewen (2001)
In lessons where there is a primary focus on meaning, focus on form occurs frequently.
“In lessons where there is a primary focus on meaning, focus on form occurs frequently (Ellis, Basturkmen & Loewen, 2001); Nassaji (2010).”
From Focus on form: A critical review (2016) · cites this paper as Ellis, Basturkmen & Loewen, 2001
In a classroom context, relatively few focus on form episodes concern pragmatic aspects of language.
“In a classroom context, relatively few episodes concern pragmatic aspects of language (Ellis, Basturkmen & Loewen, 2001).”
From Focus on form: A critical review (2016) · cites this paper as Ellis, Basturkmen & Loewen, 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Task‐based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings
Ellis, R. (2009) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x · Cited by 1,031 · see citing works
Self-citationORAL FEEDBACK IN CLASSROOM SLA: A Meta-Analysis
Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263109990520 · Cited by 838 · see citing works
Corrective Feedback and Teacher Development
Ellis, R. (2009) · L2 Journal · doi:10.5070/l2.v1i1.9054 · Cited by 659 · see citing works
“The claim that immediate CF inevitably disrupts fluency work is probably not justified, as Ellis, Basturkmen, and Loewen (2001) have shown.”
BackgroundSelf-citationFeedback, Noticing and Instructed Second Language Learning
Mackey, A. (2006) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/ami051 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
Focus on form: A critical review
Ellis, R. (2016) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168816628627 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Self-citationINCIDENTAL FOCUS ON FORM AND SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING
Loewen, S. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263105050163 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Self-citationInteraction and instructed second language acquisition
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444818000125 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Self-citationPosition paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward
Ellis, R. (2017) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444817000179 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Self-citationResponses to Recasts: Repetitions, Primed Production, and Linguistic Development
McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2006) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00393.x · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Eye tracking as a measure of noticing: A study of explicit recasts in SCMC
Smith, B. (2012) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44300 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Prompts and recasts: Differential effects on second language morphosyntax
Ammar, A. (2008) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168807086287 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Egi, T. (2007) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263107070416 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Variation in the frequency and characteristics of incidental focus on form
Loewen, S. (2003) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1191/1362168803lr129oa · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Self-citationSaito, K. (2013) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12015 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Interactional feedback in learner-learner interactions in a task-based EFL classroom
Fujii, A., & Mackey, A. (2009) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral.2009.012 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
A Comparison of L2–L2 and L2–Heritage Learner Interactions in Spanish Language Classrooms
Bowles, M. A., Adams, R. J., & Toth, P. D. (2014) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12086 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
The Occurrence and Effectiveness of Spontaneous Focus on Form in Adult ESL Classrooms
Nassaji, H. (2010) · The Canadian Modern Language Review · doi:10.3138/cmlr.66.6.907 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Pourmousavi, Z., & Mohamadi Zenouzagh, Z. (2020) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-020-00088-w · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Venue
- Language Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 281-318
- ISSN
- 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9922
- OpenAlex
- W2128928398
- Cited by
- 595
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 36
- FWCI
- 84.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language Learning (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Keywords
- learner uptake, form-focused instruction, communicative language teaching, English as a second language, negotiation of meaning, classroom context
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review