The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in biofilm-growing bacteria
Open accessAbstract
Biofilms are organized bacterial communities embedded in an extracellular polymeric matrix attached to living or abiotic surfaces. The development of biofilms is currently recognized as one of the most relevant drivers of persistent infections. Among them, chronic respiratory infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis patients is probably the most intensively studied. The lack of correlation between conventional susceptibility test results and therapeutic success in chronic infections is probably a consequence of the use of planktonically growing instead of biofilm-growing bacteria. Therefore, several in vitro models to evaluate antimicrobial activity on biofilms have been implemented over the last decade. Microtitre plate-based assays, the Calgary device, substratum suspending reactors and the flow cell system are some of the most used in vitro biofilm models for susceptibility studies. Likewise, new pharmacodynamic parameters, including minimal biofilm inhibitory concentration, minimal biofilm-eradication concentration, biofilm bactericidal concentration, and biofilm-prevention concentration, have been defined in recent years to quantify antibiotic activity in biofilms. Using these parameters, several studies have shown very significant quantitative and qualitative differences for the effects of most antibiotics when acting on planktonic or biofilm bacteria. Nevertheless, standardization of the procedures, parameters and breakpoints, by official agencies, is needed before they are implemented in clinical microbiology laboratories for routine susceptibility testing. Research efforts should also be directed to obtaining a deeper understanding of biofilm resistance mechanisms, the evaluation of optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models for biofilm growth, and correlation with clinical outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections
Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S., & Greenberg, E. P. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 · Cited by 12,167
Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms
Donlan, R. M., & Costerton, J. W. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.2.167-193.2002 · Cited by 6,644
(2005) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200405-644st · Cited by 5,877
Costerton, J. W., Lewandowski, Z., Caldwell, D. E., Korber, D. R., & Lappin-Scott, H. M. (1995) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.mi.49.100195.003431 · Cited by 4,544
Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents
Mah, T.-F. C., & O'Toole, G. A. (2001) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0966-842x(00)01913-2 · Cited by 3,921
Handbook Of Biological Confocal Microscopy
(2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-45524-2 · Cited by 3,637
Biofilm formation as microbial development
O'Toole, G., Kaplan, H. B., & Kolter, R. (2000) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.49 · Cited by 3,571
Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms
Høiby, N., Bjarnsholt, T., Givskov, M., Molin, S., & Ciofu, O. (2010) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.12.011 · Cited by 3,225
Biofilms as Complex Differentiated Communities
Stoodley, P., Sauer, K., Davies, D. G., & Costerton, J. W. (2002) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.160705 · Cited by 3,158
Bacterial Biofilms in Nature and Disease
Costerton, J. W., Cheng, K. J., Geesey, G. G., Ladd, T. I., Nickel, J. C., Dasgupta, M., & Marrie, T. J. (1987) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.mi.41.100187.002251 · Cited by 3,145
Cited by
Ciofu, O., & Tolker-Nielsen, T. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00913 · Cited by 720
Ecology and evolution of antimicrobial resistance in bacterial communities
Bottery, M. J., Pitchford, J. W., & Friman, V.-P. (2021) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-020-00832-7 · Cited by 396
Biofilms: Understanding the structure and contribution towards bacterial resistance in antibiotics
Shree, P., Singh, C. K., Sodhi, K. K., Surya, J. N., & Singh, D. K. (2023) · Medicine in Microecology · doi:10.1016/j.medmic.2023.100084 · Cited by 396
Mechanisms of Action for Antimicrobial Peptides With Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Functions
Raheem, N., & Straus, S. K. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.02866 · Cited by 369
Challenges in the management of chronic wound infections
Falcone, M., De Angelis, B., Pea, F., Scalise, A., Stefani, S., Tasinato, R., Zanetti, O., & Dalla Paola, L. (2021) · Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance · doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2021.05.010 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Macia, M. D., Rojo-Molinero, E., & Oliver, A.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology and Infection
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 981-990
- ISSN
- 1198-743X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168879981
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 92
- FWCI
- 5.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in biofilm-growing bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1469-0691.12651
- The paper
- Macia, M. D., Rojo-Molinero, E., & Oliver, A. (2014). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in biofilm-growing bacteria. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12651
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.