CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 427Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyReading and Literacy Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuropsychological profiles of adolescents with ADHD: effects of reading difficulties and gender

Rucklidge, Julia J., Tannock, Rosemary·2002·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
DOI 10.1111/1469-7610.00227
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background: Executive function, particularly behavioral inhibition, has been implicated as a core deficit specific to Attention‐Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) whereas rapid naming has been implicated as a core deficit specific to reading disabilities (RD). Females may be less impaired in executive function although adolescent females with ADHD have yet to be studied. Method: Neuropsychological profiles of four adolescent groups aged 13–16 with equal female representation were investigated: 35 ADHD, 12 RD, 24 ADHD+RD, and 37 normal controls. A semi‐structured interview (K‐SADS‐PL), the Conners Rating Scales and the Ontario Child Health Study Scales were used to diagnose ADHD. RD was defined as a standard score below 90 on at least one of the following: Reading or Spelling of the WRAT3 or Word Attack or Word Identification of the WRMT‐R. The WISC‐III, Rapid Automatized Naming, Stroop and Stop tasks were used as measures of cognitive and executive function. Results: The two ADHD groups (ADHD, ADHD+RD) showed deficits in processing speed, naming of objects, poor behavioral inhibition and greater variability in reaction times whereas the two RD groups (RD, RD+ADHD) showed verbal working memory deficits and slower verbal retrieval speed. Only the comorbid group was slower with naming of numbers and colors and had slower reaction times. Regression analyses indicated that incongruent color naming (Stroop) and variability in go reaction time were the best predictors of hyperactive/impulsive ADHD symptoms whereas variability in go reaction time and processing speed were the best predictors of inattentive ADHD symptoms. Speed of letter naming and verbal working memory accounted for the most variability in composite achievement scores. No gender differences were found on any of the cognitive tests. Conclusions: This study challenges the importance of behavioral inhibition deficits in ADHD and that naming deficits are specific to RD. Further investigation into cognitive deficits in these groups is required. ADHD: Attention‐Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder; RD: Reading Difficulties; SES: socio‐economic status; CTRS: Conners' Teacher Rating Scale; OCHSS: Ontario Child Health Study Scales; WRAT: Wide Range Achievement Test; WRMT: Woodcock Reading Mastery Test; MDD: Major Depressive Disorder; SAD: Separation Anxiety Disorder; GAD: Generalized Anxiety Disorder; OCD: Obsessive Compulsive Disorder; WISC: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children; RAN: Rapid Automatized Naming; SSRT: Stop Signal Reaction Time;

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1469-7610.00227

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.65 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–427 of 427

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Rucklidge, J. J., & Tannock, R.
Affiliations
Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
Corresponding author
Rucklidge, Julia J.
ORCID
Rucklidge, Julia J.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-10-28
Volume
43
Issue
8
Pages
988-1003
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
DOI
10.1111/1469-7610.00227
OpenAlex
W2126506202
Cited by
426
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 22
FWCI
7.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UC Research Repository (University of Canterbury) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, reading disorders, executive function, behavioral inhibition, rapid automatized naming, processing speed, verbal working memory, reaction time variability, gender differences, comorbidities, adolescents, hyperactive-impulsive symptoms, inattentive symptoms, neuropsychological profile, Stroop task, stop-signal task, socioeconomic status, anxiety disorders, depression
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Cognition, Dyslexia, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Neuropsychology, Reading, Sex Factors, Wechsler Scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review