The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test Revised Version: A Study with Normal Adults, and Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High‐functioning Autism
Abstract
In 1997 in this Journal we published the “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test, as a measure of adult “mentalising”. Whilst that test succeeded in discriminating a group of adults with Asperger syndrome (AS) or high‐functioning autism (HFA) from controls, it suffered from several psychometric problems. In this paper these limitations are rectified by revising the test. The Revised Eyes Test was administered to a group of adults with AS or HFA ( N = 15) and again discriminated these from a large number of normal controls ( N = 239) drawn from different samples. In both the clinical and control groups the Eyes Test was inversely correlated with the Autism Spectrum Quotient (the AQ), a measure of autistic traits in adults of normal intelligence. The Revised Eyes Test has improved power to detect subtle individual differences in social sensitivity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Likewise, scores in the RMET are similar to those seen in other publications with autistic participants [41, 71].”
From A 'choice', an 'addiction', a way 'out of the lost': Exploring self-injury in autistic people without intellectual disability (2019) · cites this paper as [41]
In the citing paper
“deficits in the popular ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ task (RMET) [41] were unrelated to the presence of self-injury, its range or frequency or its use for the functional purpose of communicating with others”
From A 'choice', an 'addiction', a way 'out of the lost': Exploring self-injury in autistic people without intellectual disability (2019) · cites this paper as [41]
In the citing paper
“Another study also reported that 8 weeks of cognitive-based compassion training could significantly enhance the accuracy in inferring others' mental states in the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test [39] and increased the neural activation in the inferior frontal gyrus and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, which are important for the theory of mind [40].”
From Potential therapeutic effects of meditation for treating affective dysregulation (2014) · cites this paper as [39]
In the citing paper
“These ToM tasks measure the ability to employ mental states in explanations and predictions of behavior and as such can be distinguished from tasks that may only require emotion recognition (e.g., Baron-Cohen et al., 2001; Oakley et al., 2016), or only require empathic sharing of mental states (e.g., Quesque et al., 2024; Reniers et al., 2011).”
From Longitudinal development of theory of mind in adolescence and its associations with fiction reading experience. (2025) · cites this paper as Baron-Cohen et al., 2001
In the citing paper
“While the Eyes Test is proposed to measure a single construct (Baron-Cohen et al., 2001), as noted previously others have suggested that there might be subscales composed of those items that represent positive, negative, and neutral affect (Harkness et al., 2005; Maurage et al., 2011; Konrath et al., 2014).”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Baron-Cohen et al., 2001
In the citing paper
“The Eyes Test was designed to measure the first stage of ToM attribution, which is identifying the relevant mental state of the stimulus (as opposed to the second stage; inferring the content of that mental state; see Baron-Cohen et al., 2001).”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Baron-Cohen et al., 2001
In the citing paper
“Of note, this version of the Eyes Test is considered superior to earlier versions, largely on the grounds of reliability and validity evidence (see Baron-Cohen et al., 2001).”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Baron-Cohen et al., 2001
In the citing paper
“The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test is a popular measure of individual differences in Theory of Mind capabilities (ToM; Baron-Cohen et al., 2001).”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Baron-Cohen et al., 2001
In the citing paper
“The test distinguishes many clinical populations (most often individuals on the autistic spectrum) from unimpaired control participants in their ToM capabilities.”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Baron-Cohen et al., 2001
In the citing paper
“With the exception of item 17, the most frequently chosen response option was the correct response option (see Table A1 in Supplementary Materials), which is supported by prior studies of normal populations (e.g., Baron-Cohen et al., 2001; Harkness et al., 2005).”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Baron-Cohen et al., 2001
In the citing paper
“First, Baron-Cohen and colleagues did not discuss purposely including items with different affects and they never proposed that the affect of the target word could be used to create subscales or should bias performance on the test, so in our analyses we operated under the assumption that there was no preference in terms of which items were the most appropriate for the measure of ToM.”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Baron-Cohen et al., 2001
In the citing paper
“First, Baron-Cohen and colleagues did not discuss purposely including items with different affects and they never proposed that the affect of the target word could be used to create subscales or should bias performance on the test, so in our analyses we operated under the assumption that there was no preference in terms of which items were the most appropriate for the measure of ToM.”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Baron-Cohen et al., 2001
In the citing paper
“Based on the effect size (d = 1.27) between ASD and control participants on the RMET reported in Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, Hill, et al. (2001), we determined that a sample size of 19 participants per group would provide a power of 0.8 to detect group differences using an independent t test and α < .05.”
From ‘Theory of Mind’ is not Theory of Emotion: a cautionary note on the reading the Mind in the Eyes test (2016) · cites this paper as Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, Hill, et al., 2001
In the citing paper
“Its validity is supported by the poor performance of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) on the task (Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, Hill, et al., 2001), a group that has known ToM impairments (Castelli, Frith, Happé, & Frith, 2002).”
From ‘Theory of Mind’ is not Theory of Emotion: a cautionary note on the reading the Mind in the Eyes test (2016) · cites this paper as Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, Hill, et al., 2001
In the citing paper
“The alexithymic group also performed significantly worse than the control participants reported in Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, Hill, et al. (2001): N = 225, M = 27.02, SD = 3.67; independent samples t test: t(237) = 2.31, p = .021, d = 0.638, 95% CI for d [0.094, 1.180]”
From ‘Theory of Mind’ is not Theory of Emotion: a cautionary note on the reading the Mind in the Eyes test (2016) · cites this paper as Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, Hill, et al., 2001
In the citing paper
“the original set of 36 items was split into two equally difficult halves (as in Samur et al., 2018, Experiment 3), based on the item accuracy reported for university students (Baron-Cohen et al., 2001)”
From The effects of reading narrative fiction on social and moral cognition (2021) · cites this paper as Baron-Cohen et al., 2001
In the citing paper
“The present score after placebo administration is also slightly higher than ASD norms for RMET performance (61%).49”
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,601–1,700 of 1,768
Desarrollo de la Teoría de la Mente entre los 5 y 6 años
Rivas-García, S., Hidalgo-Ruzzante, N. A., Gutiérrez-García, G., et al. (2018) · Revista de Discapacidad Clínica y Neurociencias · doi:10.14198/dcn.2018.5.2.04
Mentalizing : Competence and process
Möller, C. M. (2018) · Linköping studies in behavioural science · doi:10.3384/diss.diva-152253
Griffiths, S., Attwood, A. S., Penton‐Voak, I. S., Jarrold, C., & Munafo, M. R. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/524322
Cognición social y juicio moral en agresores sexuales y en no agresores
Burgos, M. A., Gutiérrez, L. C. H., & López, Á. M. B. (2017) · Universidad Santo Tomás eBooks · doi:10.15332/tg.mae.2017.00609
Hammad, M. A. (2017) · Journal of Educational & Psychological Sciences · doi:10.12785/jeps/180420
The History of the Neuropsychology of Emotion
Teague, E. B., Meltzer, E. P., Stafford, R. J., Twaite, J. T., Filangieri, C. M., & Borod, J. C. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199765683.013.25
Coutrot, A., Binetti, N., Harrison, C., Mareschal, I., & Johnston, A. (2017) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/17.1.18
Emotion Recognition Ability in Older Adults
Dimelow, N. A. (2019) · Sheffield Hallam University · doi:10.7190/shu-thesis-00199 · Cited by 1
Feelings of Parents with Broader Autism Phenotype Towards Their Autistic Child
Goltzer, G., & Pearlman-Avnion, S. (2019) · Autism and child psychopathology series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-28833-4_12
Cognitive Processes to Understand Alcohol Use Disorder
Máttyássy, A. (2019) · SZTE Repository of Dissertations (University of Szeged) · doi:10.14232/phd.10244
Detecting Deception Using Neurofuzzy Approach
Owolafe, O. (2019) · International Journal of Intelligent Computing Research · doi:10.20533/ijicr.2042.4655.2019.0120
God Naturally, Disorder Actually
McCauley, R. N., & Graham, G. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190091149.003.0001
McCauley, R. N., & Graham, G. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190091149.003.0002
McCauley, R. N., & Graham, G. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190091149.003.0003
Searching for the Gods’ Minds the Hard Way
McCauley, R. N., & Graham, G. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190091149.003.0005
McCauley, R. N., & Graham, G. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190091149.003.0006
Scrupulosity, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, and Ritual
McCauley, R. N., & Graham, G. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190091149.003.0004
Ekspozycja na fabularną prozę a spontaniczna versus jawna mentalizacja
Putko, A., Michałowska, A., & Złotogórska, A. (2020) · Psychologia Rozwojowa · doi:10.4467/20843879pr.20.003.12000
MEDICIÓN DE LA PERCEPCIÓN EMOCIONAL Y LA PERCEPCIÓN EMOCIONAL EN NIÑOS CON TDAH Y TOD
Jaraba-Vergara, R., Ruiz, U., & Navarro-Obeid, J. (2020) · CORPORACIÓN UNIVERSITARIA DEL CARIBE CECAR eBooks · doi:10.21892/978-958-5547-34-6.3
Kist, J. D., Bethlehem, R. A. I., Stonier, B., Sluijters, O. J. J., Crockford, S. K., de Jonge, E., Freyberg, J., Baron‐Cohen, S., & Parsons, O. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.09.11.292706
Self-citationSocialkognitiv testning af personer med skizofreni
Bundsgaard, A. M. (2019) · Psyke & Logos · doi:10.7146/pl.v40i2.117805
Hvornår måler vi Theory of Mind hos unge og voksne med autismespektrumforstyrrelser?
Cantino, C. (2019) · Psyke & Logos · doi:10.7146/pl.v40i2.117814
Sales, H. F. S., Silva, G. M., Silva, J. B. S., Rodrigues, S. J., de Andrade, M. J. O., Fernandes, T. P., & dos Santos, N. A. (2020) · Psico · doi:10.15448/1980-8623.2020.3.34083
Το αυτιστικό φάσμα υπό το πρίσμα της γνωστικής ψυχολογίας: Επισκόπηση της σύγχρονης βιβλιογραφίας
Κωστάκη, Δ. Σ. (2020) · Psychology the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society · doi:10.12681/psy_hps.23756
Cognitive Skills and Economic Preferences in the Fund IndustryPreprint
Faragó, Á., Holmén, M., Holzmeister, F., Kirchler, M., & Razen, M. (2019) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/964ba
Tunnekuvausten sukupuolierot autismikirjon ja verrokkiryhmän nuorten aikuisten kerronnassa
Dindar, K., Loukusa, S., Mäkinen, L., Kotila, A., Hurtig, T. M., & Ebeling, H. E. (2021) · Puhe ja kieli · doi:10.23997/pk.107692 · Cited by 1
Stress affects the prediction of others’ behaviorPreprint
Witt, S., Seehagen, S., & Zmyj, N. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/jbswq
From neutral to emotional: The Facial Expression Intensity Test (FExIT)Preprint
Cayol, Z., & Nazir, T. A. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/msrv6
Sergiou, C. S., Santarnecchi, E., Romanella, S. M., Wieser, M. J., Franken, I. H. A., Rassin, E., & van Dongen, J. D. M. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/cjgdt
Telcharov, O. (2021) · PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL · doi:10.31108/1.2021.7.2.6
Micronutrient intervention effects on cognitive outcomes in post-acute traumatic brain injury
Denniss, R. J. (2020) · Sheffield Hallam University · doi:10.7190/shu-thesis-00356
Neden İki Dil Tek Dilden Daha İyidir?
Karakelle, S., Demirkan, E., & Karslı, Y. (2021) · Istanbul University Press eBooks · doi:10.26650/bs/ss41.2021.001-4.03
I Cannot See it in Their Eyes: How Autism Symptoms Hamper Dating
Mintah, K. (2014) · Carleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University) · doi:10.22215/etd/2014-10436
Cognitive and affective Theory of Mind double dissociation after parietal and temporal lobe tumorsPreprint
Campanella, F., West, T., Corradi‐Dell’Acqua, C., & Škrap, M. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.26.465856
Social attention in the real world
Holleman, G. A. (2021) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · doi:10.33540/1050
Bar, T., Ikshaibon, I., Abu-Alhiga, M., Peleg, T., Awad-Igbaria, Y., Palzur, E., Golani, I., Peleg, I., & Shamir, A. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.11.24.21266797
Sex-Related Neurocircuitry Supporting Camouflaging in Adults with Autism: Female Protection InsightsPreprint
Walsh, M. J. M., Pagni, B. A., Monahan, L., Delaney, S., Smith, C. J., Baxter, L., & Braden, B. B. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.11.03.466990
Karakök, B., Akdemir, D., Yalçın, S. S., Özusta, Ş., Ütine, G. E., Doğan, Ö. A., Şimşek‐Kiper, P. Ö., & Demir, G. Ü. (2021) · Güncel Pediatri · doi:10.4274/jcp.2021.04864
Top Ranked Abstracts from the 2021 Annual Meeting of the Society for Affective Science
(2021) · Affective Science · doi:10.1007/s42761-021-00069-3
Kong, Q., Currie, N., Du, K., & Ruffman, T. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1203490/v1
Hodgson, V. J., Ralph, M. L., & Jackson, R. (2022) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.01.18.476749
Savickaite, S., McDonnell, N., & Simmons, D. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/aetgr
Hanaki, N., Inukai, K., Masuda, T., & Shimodaira, Y. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4029153
Mota, S., Leckelt, M., Utesch, K., Nestler, S., Humberg, S., Schröder–Abé, M., Schmukle, S. C., & Back, M. D. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/34hrj
Observers predict actions from facial emotional expressions during real-time social interactionsPreprint
Kroczek, L. O. H., Lingnau, A., Schwind, V., Wolff, C. G., & Mühlberger, A. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/fzcau
The Effect of Reading Direction on Emotion Recognition: A Pilot Study
Vargha, B. (2019) · Mental Health & Human Resilience International Journal · doi:10.23880/mhrij-16000126
Nayar, K., Shic, F., Winston, M., Stevens, C. J., Guilfoyle, J. L., & Losh, M. C. (2022) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/xy7s9
Sex Differences in Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Multidisciplinary ReviewPreprint
Nayar, K., Hunter, S. J., & Scott, M. (2022) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/bv5yw · Cited by 1
Psychoneurobiology Research and Personalized Treatment of Schizophrenia
Sumiyoshi, T. (2022) · MDPI eBooks · doi:10.3390/books978-3-0365-2858-8
The Neuroscience of Cultural Imitative Learning and Connections to Global Mental Health
Gianola, M., & Losin, E. A. R. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190057695.013.17
Culture Shapes Face Processing
Blais, C., & Caldara, R. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190057695.013.16
Transferring Cognitive Talent Across Domains: The Case of FinancePreprint
Rotaru, K., Kalev, P. S., Yadav, N., & Bossaerts, P. L. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-598488/v2
Nair, A., Jolliffe, M., Lograsso, Y. S. S., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/hkcqn
Chen, Y., Chen, C., Martínez, R. M., Fan, Y.-T., Liu, C., & Cheng, Y. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.03.24.005272
Perspective Taking: Reducing Inequality Within and Among Countries
Bartle, T. (2021) · Encyclopedia of the UN sustainable development goals · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71060-0_60-1
Study protocol: Transitions in Adolescent Girls (TAG)Preprint
Barendse, M. E. A., Vijayakumar, N., Byrne, M. L., et al. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/pvsbw
Melby, K., Spigset, O., Gråwe, R. W., et al. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/x46jp
Social Anxiety and Theory of Mind: A Comparison of Self-Report and Objective MeasuresPreprint
Paricos, A. (2019) · Thesis Commons (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/w6hrf
Kognitív funkciók autizmusban.
Szabó-Balogh, V. (2017) · SZTE Repository of Dissertations (University of Szeged) · doi:10.14232/phd.3905
Perspective Taking: Reducing Inequality Within and Among Countries
Bartle, T. (2021) · Encyclopedia of the UN sustainable development goals · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95882-8_60
Tsuruya, N., Kobayakawa, M., & Kawamura, M. (2012) · The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association · doi:10.4992/pacjpa.76.0_1evc22
Miller, S. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197573174.003.0009
Miller, S. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197573174.003.0004
Miller, S. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197573174.003.0001
Understanding of Cognitive States
Miller, S. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197573174.003.0002
Consequences: Cognitive Development
Miller, S. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197573174.003.0006
Miller, S. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197573174.003.0010
Variations of First-Order Paradigms
Miller, S. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197573174.003.0005
Understanding of Affective States
Miller, S. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197573174.003.0003
Miller, S. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197573174.003.0008
Egocentric norm in health‐based decision making of patients on the autistic spectrum
Porter, K., & Foli, K. J. (2022) · Nursing Forum · doi:10.1111/nuf.12763
Gillespie‐Lynch, K. (2019) · American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (AERA) · doi:10.3102/1443911
A Brief Acting Experience Fosters Empathic Concern
Ishii, K., & Kanda, T. (2022) · Psihologijske teme · doi:10.31820/pt.31.1.10
Autism Spectrum Disorder Versus Major Depressive Disorder
Stavropoulos, K. K. M., Bolourian, Y., & Gotham, K. O. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780197516881.003.0007
Orme, W. H., Fowler, J. C., & Oldham, J. M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med/9780198861478.003.0039
Gordon, D., & Kidd, T. (2022) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/c68we
“I Think I’ve Always Thought I Have to Prove Myself”
Zavala, R. (2022) · San José State University ScholarWorks (San Jose State University) · doi:10.31979/etd.uxzx-z6y5
Blain, S. D., Kent, J. S., Allen, T. A., et al. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/gqaju
Theory of mind and empathy in sexual offenders
Townsend, S., & McMurran, M. (2009) · Forensic Update · doi:10.53841/bpsfu.2009.1.96.16
Sijtsma, H. (2023) · doi:10.5463/thesis.49
SEX DIFFERENCES IN THE PERCEPTION OF THE NONVERBAL FACIAL SIGNALS OF OTHERS: A REVIEWPreprint
Lassalle, A. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/yp4mb
Otsuka, T., Kokubun, K., Okamoto, M., & Yamakawa, Y. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.06.05.23290953
Assessing theory of mind in children: a tablet-based adaptation of a classic picture sequencing taskPreprint
Petit, N., Noveck, I. A., Baltazar, M., et al. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/prga8
(2023) · Psychological applications and trends · doi:10.36315/2023inpact011
EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCES IN URBACH-WIETHE DISEASE WITHOUT VISIBLE AMYGDALA DAMAGE
(2023) · Psychological applications and trends · doi:10.36315/2023inpact013
Canino, S., Torchia, V., Raimo, S., & Palermo, L. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/khtbq
A Roadmap Overview of the Research Domain Criteria
Bastiaens, T., & Claes, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197611272.013.12
Bigot, A., Tiberi, L., Saloppé, X., et al. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/s485w
Ammaniti, M., & Trentini, C. (2011) · Clínica e Investigación Relacional · doi:10.21110/19882939.2011.050104
Rafiee, Y. (2023) · eDiss (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) · doi:10.53846/goediss-10083
Vandewal, E. J. M. (2023) · Research Publications (Maastricht University) · doi:10.26481/dis.20230922ev
Ford, T. C., Hill, A. T., Parrella, N.-F., Kirkovski, M., Donaldson, P. H., & Enticott, P. G. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.09.19.558536
V Jornadas de investigación. Facultad de Psicología y Logopedia
Rey-Peña, L. (2022) · UMA Editorial eBooks · doi:10.24310/mumaedmumaed.53
Metadata
- Authors
- Baron‐Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Venue
- Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 241-251
- ISSN
- 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7610
- OpenAlex
- W4294333904
- Cited by
- 4,555
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 223 · 2025: 261 · 2024: 273 · 2023: 268 · 2022: 303 · 2021: 350 · 2020: 381 · 2019: 320 · 2018: 299 · 2017: 292 · 2016: 230 · 2015: 262 · 2014: 193 · 2013: 211 · 2012: 143
- FWCI
- 5.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Keywords
- Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, mentalization, theory of mind, Asperger syndrome, high-functioning autism, autism spectrum disorder, test revision, psychometric properties, Autism Spectrum Quotient, autistic traits, social sensitivity, adults
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
