Cited by 151Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchStress Responses and Cortisol

Vagal rebound during resolution of tearful crying among depressed and nondepressed individuals

Open access
Rottenberg, Jonathan, Wilhelm, Frank H., Gross, James J., Gotlib, Ian H.·2003·Psychophysiology

Abstract

Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) is an index of the vagal control of heart rate that is associated with emotion regulatory capacity. To examine RSA in depressed and nondepressed participants in the context of an emotion–regulatory challenge, we presented a sad film to induce crying, a behavior associated with heightened parasympathetic activation. We predicted that nondepressed persons who cried would show elevations in RSA during the onset and the resolution of crying. By contrast, we predicted that depressed individuals who cried would fail to exhibit increased RSA over the course of their crying episodes. As hypothesized, nondepressed participants exhibited RSA increases that accompanied the resolution of tearful crying, consistent with a homeostatic function for crying, whereas depressed subjects who cried did not exhibit increased RSA. Results suggest that the physiological self–regulatory mechanisms invoked by crying are compromised in depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1469-8986.00001

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mental training may prove particularly fruitful for people who exhibit altered or reduced vagal flexibility, as found in children at risk of psychopathology and people suffering from depression or social phobia.

    “Mental training may prove particularly fruitful for people who exhibit altered or reduced vagal flexibility, as found in children at risk of psychopathology83 and people suffering from depression84 or social phobia85.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rottenberg, J., Wilhelm, F. H., Gross, J. J., & Gotlib, I. H.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
1-6
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W2099673742
Cited by
151
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH59259, MH 58147, MH 56094, R01MH056094, R01MH059259)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
respiratory sinus arrhythmia, depression, emotion regulation, parasympathetic activation, heart rate variability, physiological self-regulation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Arrhythmia, Sinus, Crying, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Vagus Nerve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review