The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential
Abstract
It is well established that reaction time (RT) is shorter when a response signal is preceded by a warning signal, because the warning signal causes the participant to prepare for the upcoming response. A review of chronometric and psychophysiological studies reveals the prevailing view that this temporal preparation operates mainly at a motor level speeding up rather late processes. To assess the locus of this preparation effect, we conducted two experiments employing the lateralized readiness potential (LRP). Contrary to this prevailing view, the results of both experiments clearly indicate that temporal preparation enhances the processing speed of relatively early processes, because a manipulation of temporal uncertainty affected RT, the P300 latency, and the stimulus‐to‐LRP interval but not the LRP‐to‐keypress interval.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?
Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00058027 · Cited by 3,585
The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method
Sternberg, S. (1969) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9 · Cited by 3,137
On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade.
McClelland, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.86.4.287 · Cited by 1,298
The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes
Eimer, M. (1998) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03209424 · Cited by 275
Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal them
Sternberg, S. (2001) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/s0001-6918(00)00045-7 · Cited by 266
Reaction Time Deficits and Parkinson's Disease
Gauntlett-Gilbert, J., & Brown, V. J. (1998) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(98)00014-1 · Cited by 142
Cited by
Temporal cognition: Connecting subjective time to perception, attention, and memory.
Matthews, W. J., & Meck, W. H. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000045 · Cited by 384
Los, S. A., & Heslenfeld, D. J. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.1.52 · Cited by 115
Temporal Preparation for Speaking in Question-Answer Sequences
Magyari, L., De Ruiter, J. P., & Levinson, S. C. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00211 · Cited by 61
Interaction of raclopride and preparatory interval effects on simple reaction time performance
MacDonald, C. J., & Meck, W. H. (2006) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2006.08.004 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- MÜller‐Gethmann, H., Ulrich, R., & Rinkenauer, G.
- Venue
- Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-06-10
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 597-611
- ISSN
- 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8986
- OpenAlex
- W2102584474
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1469-8986.00061
- The paper
- MÜller‐Gethmann, H., Ulrich, R., & Rinkenauer, G. (2003). Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.00061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
