The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation
Abstract
Eye movements, eye blinks, cardiac signals, muscle noise, and line noise present serious problems for electroencephalographic (EEG) interpretation and analysis when rejecting contaminated EEG segments results in an unacceptable data loss. Many methods have been proposed to remove artifacts from EEG recordings, especially those arising from eye movements and blinks. Often regression in the time or frequency domain is performed on parallel EEG and electrooculographic (EOG) recordings to derive parameters characterizing the appearance and spread of EOG artifacts in the EEG channels. Because EEG and ocular activity mix bidirectionally, regressing out eye artifacts inevitably involves subtracting relevant EEG signals from each record as well. Regression methods become even more problematic when a good regressing channel is not available for each artifact source, as in the case of muscle artifacts. Use of principal component analysis (PCA) has been proposed to remove eye artifacts from multichannel EEG. However, PCA cannot completely separate eye artifacts from brain signals, especially when they have comparable amplitudes. Here, we propose a new and generally applicable method for removing a wide variety of artifacts from EEG records based on blind source separation by independent component analysis (ICA). Our results on EEG data collected from normal and autistic subjects show that ICA can effectively detect, separate, and remove contamination from a wide variety of artifactual sources in EEG records with results comparing favorably with those obtained using regression and PCA methods. ICA can also be used to analyze blink-related brain activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution
Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1995) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1995.7.6.1129 · Cited by 8,986
Independent component analysis, A new concept?
Comon, P. (1994) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/0165-1684(94)90029-9 · Cited by 8,205
A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9 · Cited by 5,055
Lee, T.-W., Girolami, M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1999) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976699300016719 · Cited by 1,967
Self-citationIndependent Component Analysis of Electroencephalographic Data
Makeig, S., Bell, A. J., Jung, T., & B, T. J. S. A. (1995) · Cited by 1,957
Self-citationA New Learning Algorithm for Blind Signal Separation
Амари, Ш.-И., Cichocki, A. S., & Yang, H. H. (1995) · Cited by 1,904
Calculating the Singular Values and Pseudo-Inverse of a Matrix
Golub, G., & Kahan, W. (1965) · Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Series B Numerical Analysis · doi:10.1137/0702016 · Cited by 1,786
The removal of the eye-movement artifact from the EEG by regression analysis in the frequency domain
Woestenburg, J. C., Verbaten, M. N., & Slangen, J. L. (1983) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/0301-0511(83)90059-5 · Cited by 352
Lagerlund, T. D., Sharbrough, F. W., & Busacker, N. E. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1097/00004691-199701000-00007 · Cited by 319
Nonlinear neurons in the low-noise limit: a factorial code maximizes information transfer
Nadal, J., & Parga, N. (1994) · Network Computation in Neural Systems · doi:10.1088/0954-898x/5/4/008 · Cited by 282
Cited by
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · Cited by 24,371
Self-citationBrain–computer interfaces for communication and control
Wolpaw, J. R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D. J., Pfurtscheller, G., & Vaughan, T. M. (2002) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00057-3 · Cited by 7,927
Independent Component Analysis: Principles and Practice
(2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511624148 · Cited by 1,917
Delorme, A., Sejnowski, T., & Makeig, S. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.004 · Cited by 1,759
Self-citationNon-contact, automated cardiac pulse measurements using video imaging and blind source separation
Poh, M.-Z., McDuff, D. J., & Picard, R. W. (2010) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.18.010762 · Cited by 1,643
Metadata
- Authors
- Jung, T., Makeig, S., Humphries, C., Lee, T.-W., McKeown, M. J., Iragui, V. J., & Sejnowski, T. J.
- Venue
- Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-03-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 163-178
- ISSN
- 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079277602
- Cited by
- 3,334
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 12.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0048577200980259
- The paper
- Jung, T., Makeig, S., Humphries, C., Lee, T.-W., McKeown, M. J., Iragui, V. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000). Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0048577200980259
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.