All bereaved parents are entitled to good care after stillbirth: a mixed‐methods multicentre study (INSIGHT)
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To understand challenges in care after stillbirth and provide tailored solutions. DESIGN: Multi-centre case study. SETTING: Three maternity hospitals. POPULATION: Parents with a stillborn baby, maternity staff. METHODS: Thematic analysis of parent interviews and staff focus groups and service provision investigation. OUTCOMES: 1 Themes; 2 Triangulation matrix; 3 Recommendations. RESULTS: Twenty-one women, 14 partners, and 22 staff participated. Service Provision: Care for parents after stillbirth varies excessively; there are misconceptions; post-mortem does not delay follow-up. PRESENTATION: Women 'do not feel right' before stillbirth; their management is haphazard and should be standardised. DIAGNOSIS: Stillbirth is an emergency for parents but not always for staff; communication can seem cold; well-designed bereavement space is critical. Birth: Staff shift priorities to mother and future, but for parents their baby is still a baby; parents are not comfortable with staff recommending vaginal birth as the norm; there are several reasons why parents ask for a caesarean; better care involves clear communication, normal behaviour, and discussion of coping strategies. Post-mortem: Parents are influenced by discussions with staff. Staff should 'sow seeds', clarify its respectful nature, delineate its purpose, and explain the timescale. FOLLOW-UP: It is not standardised; parents wish to see their multi-professional team. CONCLUSIONS: There is unacceptable variation in care after stillbirth, and insensitive interactions between staff and bereaved parents. Understanding parents' needs, including why they ask for caesarean birth, will facilitate joint decision-making. Every bereaved parent is entitled to good, respectful care. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Care too varied & interactions often insensitive after stillbirth; national pathway & training urgently needed PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Why and how was the study carried out? Previous studies have shown that improving care after stillbirth is important for families. We investigated the opinions of bereaved parents and maternity staff to find ways to improve care. At three hospitals in 2013, all women who experienced a stillbirth were invited to an interview along with their partners. Thirty-five parents of 21 babies agreed to participate. Twenty-two obstetricians and midwives took part in focus group discussions. What were the main findings? Care was often not as good as it should and could be. Communication with parents was not always as sensitive as they would have liked because staff did not have appropriate training. Some women reported they did not 'feel right' before going to hospital. Once they arrived, there was no standard approach to how care was given. Sometimes there were long delays before the death of the baby was confirmed and action was taken. After it had been confirmed that the baby had died, staff focussed on the mothers' needs, but the parents' priorities were still with their baby. There were several reasons why parents asked for a caesarean birth that staff had not considered. Staff influenced parents' decisions about post-mortem examinations. Parents found it helpful when staff explained the respectful nature and purpose of the examination. After discharge from hospital, there was no consistent plan for how follow-up care would be given. Parents would have liked more information about their next hospital appointment. What are the limitations of the work? The parents interviewed depended on their memories of the details of the care, which happened some time ago. In staff group discussions, junior doctors may not have spoken openly because there were senior doctors present. Further research is necessary to understand and improve care globally. What is the implication for parents? Every bereaved parent is entitled to the best possible care after stillbirth, but some do not get good care. Parents and staff made suggestions that can help to develop processes for how care is given after stillbirth. These suggestions can also inform staff training, so that every single parent is treated respectfully and participates in decision making.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 · Cited by 42,509 · see citing works
Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies
O'Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c4587 · Cited by 1,584 · see citing works
Stillbirths: economic and psychosocial consequences
Heazell, A. E. P., Siassakos, D., Blencowe, H., Burden, C., Bhutta, Z. A., Cacciatore, J., Dang, N., Das, J., Flenady, V., Gold, K. J., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00836-3 · Cited by 792 · see citing works
Self-citationBurden, C., Bradley, S., Storey, C., Ellis, A., Heazell, A. E. P., Downe, S., Cacciatore, J., & Siassakos, D. (2016) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-016-0800-8 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Self-citationEllis, A., Chebsey, C., Storey, C., Bradley, S., Jackson, S., Flenady, V., Heazell, A., & Siassakos, D. (2016) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-016-0806-2 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Self-citationHeazell, A., McLaughlin, M., Schmidt, E., Cox, P., Flenady, V, Khong, T., & Downe, S. (2012) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03357.x · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Late intrauterine fetal death and stillbirth
Pundir, J., & Coomarasamy, A. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107338876.006 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Stillbirths: ending an epidemic of grief
Horton, R. C., & Samarasekera, U. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01276-3 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Stillbirth should be given greater priority on the global health agenda
Qureshi, Z. U., Millum, J., Blencowe, H. K., Kelley, M. C., Fottrell, E. F., Lawn, J. E., Costello, A. M. D. L., & Colbourn, T. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.h4620 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Stillbirth: public/patient involvement in sensitive research and research ethics
Siassakos, D. M., Storey, C., Davey, L., et al. (2015) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13412 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationProceedings of 2014 Stillbirth Summit
Wimmer, L. (2015) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/1471-2393-15-s1-a1 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Boynton, P. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00039-8 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Infant Mortality and Stillbirth in the UK
Bunn, S., & Montacute, R. (2016) · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Fretts, R. C. (2015) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/1471-2393-15-s1-a11 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Implementation strategies – moving guidance into practice
Latibeaudiere, M., Phillips, J., Siassakos, D. M., Winter, C., Draycott, T. J., & Fox, R. (2013) · The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist · doi:10.1111/j.1744-4667.2012.00141.x · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Clinical practice guidelines for perinatal bereavement care — an overview
Boyle, F. M., Horey, D., Middleton, P. F., & Flenady, V. (2020) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2019.01.008 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Impact of perinatal death on the social and Family context of the parents
Fernández-Sola, C., Camacho-Ávila, M., Hernández-Padilla, J. M., Fernández-Medina, I. M., Jiménez-López, F. R., Hernández-Sánchez, E., Conesa-Ferrer, M. B., & Granero-Molina, J. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17103421 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Pregnancy and infant loss: a survey of families’ experiences in Ontario Canada
Watson, J., Simmonds, A., La Fontaine, M., & Fockler, M. E. (2019) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-019-2270-2 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Parents' experiences about support following stillbirth and neonatal death
Camacho Ávila, M., Fernández Medina, I. M., Jiménez-López, F. R., Granero-Molina, J., Hernández-Padilla, J. M., Hernández Sánchez, E., & Fernández-Sola, C. (2020) · Advances in Neonatal Care · doi:10.1097/anc.0000000000000703 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Lewkowitz, A. K., Rosenbloom, J. I., Keller, M., López, J. D., Macones, G. A., Olsen, M. A., & Cahill, A. G. (2019) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.027 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Mills, T., Ayebare, E., Mukhwana, R., Mweteise, J., Nabisere, A., Nendela, A., Ndungu, P., Okello, M., Omoni, G., Wakasiaka, S., et al. (2021) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16413 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Care quality following intrauterine death in Spanish hospitals: results from an online survey
Cassidy, P. R. (2018) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1630-z · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Midwives’ experience of delivery care in late foetal death: a qualitative study
Martínez-Serrano, P., Palmar-Santos, A. M., Solís-Muñoz, M., Álvarez-Plaza, C., & Pedraz-Marcos, A. (2018) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2018.08.010 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
The experience of mothers and fathers in cases of stillbirth in Spain. A qualitative study
Martínez-Serrano, P., Pedraz-Marcos, A., Solís-Muñoz, M., & Palmar-Santos, A. M. (2019) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2019.06.013 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Roberts, L. R., Nick, J. M., Sarpy, N. L., Peters, J., & Tamares, S. (2024) · JBI Evidence Synthesis · doi:10.11124/jbies-23-00149 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Actis Danna, V., Lavender, T., Laisser, R., Chimwaza, A., Chisuse, I., Kasengele, C. T., Kimaro, D., Kuzenza, F. D., Lyangenda, K., Mwamadi, M., et al. (2023) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2022.04.006 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Zhuang, S., Ma, X., Xiao, G., Zhao, Y., Hou, J., & Wang, Y. (2022) · Journal of Pediatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2022.04.007 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Redshaw, M., Henderson, J., & Bevan, C. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050832 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Christou, A., Alam, A., Hofiani, S. M. S., Mubasher, A., Rasooly, M. H., Rashidi, M. K., & Raynes-Greenow, C. (2021) · Journal of Perinatology · doi:10.1038/s41372-020-00907-5 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Bradford, B. F., Cronin, R. S., Popoola, T., Bright, N., & Silverio, S. A. (2024) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101622 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Kuforiji, O., Mills, T. A., & Lovell, K. (2024) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2023.11.004 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Jimoh, A. S., Wolvaardt, J. E., & Adams, S. (2022) · South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.7196/sajog.2022.v28i1.2087 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Siassakos, D., Jackson, S., Gleeson, K., Chebsey, C., Ellis, A., Storey, C., & the INSIGHT Study Group
- Affiliations
- Southmead Hospital (GB)
- University of the West of England (GB)
- University of Surrey (GB)
- Health Education England (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Siassakos, D
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-07-31
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 160-170
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- PMC
- PMC5763319
- OpenAlex
- W2739940423
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 9.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- North Bristol NHS Trust
- Stillborn and Neonatal Death Charity
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Keywords
- stillbirth, bereaved parents, postpartum care, maternal bereavement, respectful care, autopsy, caesarean birth, follow-up care, employee training, coping strategies, shared decision-making, maternity hospital, midwives, obstetricians, parental needs
- MeSH terms
- Bereavement, Female, United Kingdom, Hospitals, Maternity, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Parents, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, State Medicine, Focus Groups, Stillbirth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
