Cited by 44Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthGlobal Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Parents’ experiences of care and support after stillbirth in rural and urban maternity facilities: a qualitative study in Kenya and Uganda

Open access
Mills, TA, Ayebare, E, Mukhwana, R, Mweteise, J, Nabisere, A, Nendela, A, Ndungu, P, Okello, M +4 more·2021·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore parents' lived experiences of care and support following stillbirth in urban and rural health facilities. DESIGN: Qualitative, interpretative, guided by Heideggerian phenomenology. SETTING: Nairobi and Western Kenya, Kampala and Central Uganda. SAMPLE: A purposive sample of 75 women and 59 men who had experienced the stillbirth of their baby (≤1 year previously) and received care in the included facilities. METHODS: In-depth interviews, analysed using Van Manen's reflexive approach. RESULTS: Three main themes were identified; parents described devastating impacts and profound responses to their baby's death. Interactions with health workers were a key influence, but poor communication, environmental barriers and unsupportive facility policies/practices meant that needs were often unmet. After discharge, women and partners sought support in communities to help them cope with the death of their baby but frequently encountered stigma engendering feelings of blame and increasing isolation. CONCLUSIONS: Parents in Kenya and Uganda were not always treated with compassion and lacked the care or support they needed after the death of their baby. Health workers in Kenya and Uganda, in common with other settings, have a key role in supporting bereaved parents. There is an urgent need for context and culturally appropriate interventions to improve communication, health system and community support for African parents. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Health-system response and community support for parents after stillbirth in Kenya and Uganda are inadequate.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1471-0528.16413

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. ª 2020 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mills, T., Ayebare, E., Mukhwana, R., Mweteise, J., Nabisere, A., Nendela, A., Ndungu, P., Okello, M., Omoni, G., Wakasiaka, S., Wood, R., & Lavender, T.
Affiliations
  • Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work School of Health Sciences Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health The University of Manchester Manchester UK
  • Makerere University (UG)
  • University of Nairobi (KE)
  • NIHR Global Health Group Community Involvement and Engagement (CEI) Group Uganda Bweyogerere, Wakiso Uganda
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-08-16
Volume
128
Issue
1
Pages
101-109
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W3041988344
Cited by
44
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSTM Online Archive (Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
Wellbeing of Women (IFA 200)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
stillbirth, bereaved parents, parental grief, health worker communication, stigma, community support, Kenya, Uganda
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Kenya, Middle Aged, Parents, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Rural Population, Social Support, Uganda, Urban Population, Stillbirth, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review