Cited by 201Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Gender differences in predictors of initiation, retention, and completion in an HMO-based substance abuse treatment program

Green, Carla A, Polen, Michael R, Dickinson, Daniel M, Lynch, Frances L, Bennett, Marjorie D·2002·Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Abstract

We studied gender differences in treatment process indicators among 293 HMO members recommended for substance abuse treatment. Treatment initiation, completion, and time spent in treatment did not differ by gender, but factors predicting these outcomes differed markedly. Initiation was predicted in women by alcohol diagnoses; in men, by being employed or married. Failure to initiate treatment was predicted in women by mental health diagnoses; in men, by less education. Treatment completion was predicted in women by higher income and legal/agency referral; in men, by older age. Failure to complete was predicted in women by more dependence diagnoses and higher Addiction Severity Index Employment scores; in men, by worse psychiatric status, receiving Medicaid, and motivation for entering treatment. More time spent in treatment was predicted, in women, by alcohol or opiate diagnoses and legal/agency referral; in men, by fewer mental health diagnoses, higher education, domestic violence victim status, and prior 12-step attendance. Clinical implications of results are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0740-5472(02)00278-7

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Green, C. A., Polen, M. R., Dickinson, D. M., Lynch, F. L., & Bennett, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
Corresponding author
Green, Carla A
Venue
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-12
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
285-295
ISSN
0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122782976
Cited by
201
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Kaiser Permanente
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01aa010849-04)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA10849)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
gender differences, addiction treatment, treatment initiation, treatment completion, treatment retention, health maintenance organizations, predictors of treatment outcome, alcoholism, opioid use disorder, mental health diagnoses, domestic violence, 12-step programs, Medicaid, employment, income
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Gender Identity, Health Maintenance Organizations, Humans, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Compliance, Patient Dropouts, Retention, Psychology, Sex Factors, United States, Substance Abuse Treatment Centers, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review