The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Outcomes–Based Performance Management in the Public Sector: Implications for Government Accountability and Effectiveness
Abstract
Requirements for outcomes–based performance management are increasing performance–evaluation activities at all government levels. Research on public–sector performance management, however, points to problems in the design and management of these systems and questions their effectiveness as policy tools for increasing governmental accountability. In this article, I analyze experimental data and the performance–management experiences of federal job–training programs to estimate the influence of public management and system–design factors on program outcomes and impacts. I assess whether relying on administrative data to measure program (rather than impacts) produces information that might misdirect program managers in their performance–management activities. While the results of empirical analyses confirm that the use of administrative data in performance management is unlikely to produce accurate estimates of true program impacts, they also suggest these data can still generate useful information for public managers about policy levers that can be manipulated to improve organizational performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.
Longford, N. T., Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2075823 · Cited by 18,724
Multitask principal – agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design
Holmstrom, B., & Milgrom, P. (1991) · The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization · doi:10.1093/jleo/7.special_issue.24 · Cited by 6,046
(1941) · Research in International Economics by Federal Agencies · doi:10.7312/schw92626-009 · Cited by 4,682
Understanding performance appraisal: social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-5748 · Cited by 1,088
Incentive contracts and performance measurement
Baker, G. P. (1992) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261831 · Cited by 1,085
Managerial Dilemmas: The Political Economy of Hierarchy.
Voss, T., & Miller, G. J. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074545 · Cited by 702
Incomplete Contracts and the Theory of the Firm
(1988) · The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a036940 · Cited by 627
Managing government, governing management
Mintzberg, H. (1996) · Europa Junta · Cited by 478
Distortion and Risk in Optimal Incentive Contracts
Baker, G. (2002) · The Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.2307/3069615 · Cited by 466
Kravchuk, R. S., & Schack, R. W. (1996) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.2307/976376 · Cited by 276
Cited by
WHAT’S MEASURED IS WHAT MATTERS: TARGETS AND GAMING IN THE ENGLISH PUBLIC HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
BEVAN, G., & HOOD, C. (2006) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00600.x · Cited by 1,580
The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance
Speklé, R. F., & Verbeeten, F. H. M. (2014) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.004 · Cited by 448
Evaluating the Productivity of Collaborative Governance Regimes: A Performance Matrix
Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015) · Public Performance & Management Review · doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1031016 · Cited by 379
Performance management practices in public sector organizations: Impact on performance
Verbeeten, F. H. M. (2008) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/09513570810863996 · Cited by 338
The Impact of Performance Management on Performance in Public Organizations: A Meta‐Analysis
Gerrish, E. (2016) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12433 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Heinrich, C. J.
- Venue
- Public Administration Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 712-725
- ISSN
- 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6210
- OpenAlex
- W2084445032
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 24.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcomes–Based Performance Management in the Public Sector: Implications for Government Accountability and Effectiveness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1540-6210.00253
- The paper
- Heinrich, C. J. (2002). Outcomes–Based Performance Management in the Public Sector: Implications for Government Accountability and Effectiveness. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00253
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.