The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Extent and Determinants of the Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies
Abstract
This article addresses three questions: To what extent is university research used in government agencies? Are there differences between the policy domains in regard to the extent of use? What determines the use of university research in government agencies? The data analysis is based on a survey of 833 government officials from Canadian government agencies. Comparisons of the magnitude of uptake of university research show large and significant differences across policy domains. The results of the multivariate regression analyses show that the characteristics of research and the focus on the advancement of scholarly knowledge or on users’ needs do not explain the uptake of research. Users’ adaptation of research, users’ acquisition efforts, links between researchers and users, and users’ organizational contexts are good predictors of the uptake of research by government officials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Knowledge Creep and Decision Accretion
Weiss, C. H. (1980) · Knowledge · doi:10.1177/107554708000100303 · Cited by 669
Cited by
Diffusion Theory and Knowledge Dissemination, Utilization, and Integration in Public Health
Green, L. W., Ottoson, J. M., García, C., & Hiatt, R. A. (2009) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100049 · Cited by 953
Policy analytical capacity and evidence‐based policy‐making: Lessons from Canada
Howlett, M. (2009) · Canadian Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1754-7121.2009.00070_1.x · Cited by 527
Reconsidering evidence-based policy: Key issues and challenges
Head, B. W. (2010) · Policy and Society · doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.001 · Cited by 527
The lessons of failure: learning and blame avoidance in public policy-making
Howlett, M. (2012) · International Political Science Review · doi:10.1177/0192512112453603 · Cited by 331
Public use and public funding of science
Yin, Y., Dong, Y., Wang, K., Wang, D., & Jones, B. F. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01397-5 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Landry, R., Lamari, M., & Amara, N.
- Venue
- Public Administration Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-02-27
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 192-205
- ISSN
- 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6210
- OpenAlex
- W2061686928
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Extent and Determinants of the Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1540-6210.00279
- The paper
- Landry, R., Lamari, M., & Amara, N. (2003). The Extent and Determinants of the Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.