Cited by 114Policing Practices and PerceptionsCrime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and Penology

Do Stop, Question, and Frisk Practices Deter Crime?: Evidence at Microunits of Space and Time

Weisburd, David, Wooditch, Alese, Weisburd, Sarit, Yang, Sue‐Ming·2016·Criminology & Public Policy

Abstract

Research Summary: Existing studies examining the crime impacts of stop, question, and frisks (SQFs) have focused on large geographic areas. Weisburd, Telep, and Lawton (2014) suggested that SQFs in New York City (NYC) were highly concentrated at crime hot spots, implying that a microlevel unit of analysis may be more appropriate. The current study aims to address the limitations of prior studies by exploring the impact of SQFs on daily and weekly crime incidents in NYC at a microgeographic level. The findings suggest that SQFs produce a significant yet modest deterrent effect on crime . Policy Implications: These findings support those who argue that SQFs deter crime. Nonetheless, it is not clear whether other policing strategies may have similar or even stronger crime‐control outcomes. In turn, the level of SQFs needed to produce meaningful crime reductions are costly in terms of police time and are potentially harmful to police legitimacy .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1745-9133.12172

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weisburd, D., Wooditch, A., Weisburd, S., & Yang, S.
Affiliations
  • George Mason University (US)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Weisburd, David
Venue
Criminology & Public Policy
Published
2015-11-11
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
31-56
ISSN
  • 1538-6473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9133
OpenAlex
W2170145824
Cited by
114
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4
FWCI
84.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Criminology & Public Policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
crime deterrence, crime hotspots, New York City, police legitimacy, policing strategies, crime control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review