The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of multilevel synergistic interplay among team mastery climate, knowledge hiding, and job characteristics in stimulating innovative work behavior
Open accessAbstract
This study investigates the multilevel interplay among team‐level, job‐related, and individual characteristics in stimulating employees' innovative work behavior (IWB) based on the theoretical frameworks of achievement goal theory (AGT) and job characteristics theory (JCT). A multilevel two‐source study of 240 employees and their 34 direct supervisors in two medium‐sized Slovenian companies revealed significant two‐ and three‐way interactions, where a mastery climate, task interdependence, and decision autonomy moderated the relationship between knowledge hiding and IWB. When employees hide knowledge, a team mastery climate only facilitates high levels of IWB if accompanied by either high task interdependence or high decision autonomy. In the absence of one of these job characteristics, knowledge hiding prevents higher levels of IWB even in the case of strong team mastery climate. The results suggest that multiple job design antecedents are necessary to neutralize the negative influence of knowledge hiding on micro‐innovation processes within organizations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived organizational support.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 · Cited by 10,023 · cited 1×
“In addition, we controlled for perceived supervisor support to tap into supervisor-related variance and used four items from Eisenberger et al. (1986) – α = .84.”
MethodHUSELID, M. A. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256741 · Cited by 9,342
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314527128 · Cited by 3,103 · cited 3×
“The latest advances of JCT have also shown that the task and social job contexts substantially influence employee creativity and innovative behavior, either directly or via interacting with individual-difference variables (Anderson et al., 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialMorgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321 · Cited by 2,994
Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332 · Cited by 2,303
The Challenge of Innovation Implementation
Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259164 · Cited by 2,113
Measuring Innovative Work Behaviour
De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x · Cited by 1,644
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- Agars M.D., 2008, Multi‐level Issues in Organizational Innovation
- Amabile T.M., 1996, Creativity in Context
- 10.2307/41165921 · DOI · Paper page
- Ames C., 1992, Motivation in Sport and Exercise
- 10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<235::AID-JOB837>3.0.CO;2-C · DOI
- 10.1002/job.236 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1348/096317900167029 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1396 · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2009.0470 · DOI
- 10.1002/job.179 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01299.x · DOI
- 10.1177/2041386614564105 · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2012.0122 · DOI
- 10.1080/1359432X.2014.931325 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/job.737 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.580 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0018726700533006 · DOI
- 10.1108/IJGE-09-2012-0049 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jm.2003.07.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Hackman J.R., 1980, Work Redesign
- Hair J.F., 2006, Multivariate Data Analysis
- 10.1037/a0018556 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4337/9781783476503.00009 · DOI
- 10.5465/AMJ.2009.37308035 · DOI
- Hornung S., 2010, Beyond top‐down and bottom‐up work redesign: customizing job content through idiosyncratic deals, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 187, 10.1002/job.625 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/a0015978 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1348/096317900167038 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/job.242 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb01486.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0030-5073(79)90056-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/0030-5073(83)90118-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1348/096317905X52869 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/02783190109554087 · DOI
- 10.1111/jasp.12174 · DOI
- Noe R.A., 1997, Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage
- 10.2307/256657 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1469-0292(02)00038-9 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0023311 · DOI
- 10.1006/ceps.1999.1017 · DOI
- 10.1177/0963721410383246 · DOI
- 10.1111/caim.12084 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.223 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/256701 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004 · DOI
- Shalley C., 2008, Handbook of Organizational Creativity
- 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00332.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4337/9781783476503.00028 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.05.003 · DOI
- 10.1108/09534819910263668 · DOI
- 10.1177/014920630002600403 · DOI
- 10.1111/1464-0597.00951 · DOI · Paper page
- West M.A., 1989, Innovation at work: psychological perspectives, Social Behaviour, 4, 15
- 10.5465/amj.2010.49388995 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.261 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Bunjak, A., Černe, M., & Popovič, A. (2021) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103533 · Cited by 127
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Černe, M., Hernaus, T., Dysvik, A., & Škerlavaj, M.
- Venue
- Human Resource Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 281-299
- ISSN
- 0954-5395 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-8583
- OpenAlex
- W2604988970
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 53.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
