Cited by 49Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchRetinal Diseases and Treatments

Clinical inertia causing new or progression of diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study: 临床惰性可导致2型糖尿病患者新发视网膜病变或视网膜病变进展:一项回顾性队列研究

Osataphan, Soravis, Chalermchai, Thep, Ngaosuwan, Kanchana·2017·Journal of Diabetes

Abstract

Background Clinical inertia is a failure to intensify treatment according to evidence-based guidelines, and can have both short- and long-term adverse effects for type 2 diabetes (T2D). The aim of the present study was to demonstrate the effects of clinical inertia on glycemic control and diabetes-related complications. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university-based hospital in Thailand. Medical records were evaluated retrospectively from January 2010 to December 2014. Patients were classified into two groups: clinical inertia and non-inertia. Clinical inertia was defined as failure to initiate insulin within 3 months in patients with HbA1c ≥9 % who were already taking two oral antidiabetic agents. Results From 1206 records, 98 patients with mean HbA1c of 10.3 % were identified and enrolled in the study. The median follow-up time of these patients was 29.5 months and 68.4 % were classified into the clinical inertia group. The mean (± SD) HbA1c decrement in the clinical inertia and non-inertia groups was 0.82 ± 1.50 % and 3.02 ± 1.80 %, respectively, at 6 months (P Conclusions Clinical inertia can cause persistently poor glycemic control and speed up the progression of DR in T2D.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1753-0407.12410

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Osataphan, S., Chalermchai, T., & Ngaosuwan, K.
Affiliations
  • Srinakharinwirot University (TH)
  • Mae Fah Luang University (TH)
Corresponding author
Ngaosuwan, Kanchana
Venue
Journal of Diabetes
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-07-12
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
267-274
ISSN
  • 1753-0393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-0407
OpenAlex
W2376943461
Cited by
49
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Missouri Soybean Merchandising Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
clinical inertia, diabetic retinopathy, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, insulin initiation, oral antidiabetic drugs, retinopathy progression, general practitioners, diabetes complications
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Retinopathy, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Hospitals, University, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Thailand, Time Factors, Logistic Models, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review