Cited by 203Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningSmart Agriculture and AI

Deep learning‐based methods for individual recognition in small birds

Open access
Ferreira, André C., Silva, Liliana R., Renna, Francesco, Brandl, Hanja B., Renoult, Julien P., Farine, Damien R., Covas, Rita, Doutrelant, Claire·2020·Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Individual identification is a crucial step to answer many questions in evolutionary biology and is mostly performed by marking animals with tags. Such methods are well‐established, but often make data collection and analyses time‐consuming, or limit the contexts in which data can be collected. Recent computational advances, specifically deep learning, can help overcome the limitations of collecting large‐scale data across contexts. However, one of the bottlenecks preventing the application of deep learning for individual identification is the need to collect and identify hundreds to thousands of individually labelled pictures to train convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Here we describe procedures for automating the collection of training data, generating training datasets, and training CNNs to allow identification of individual birds. We apply our procedures to three small bird species, the sociable weaver Philetairus socius, the great tit Parus major and the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata , representing both wild and captive contexts. We first show how the collection of individually labelled images can be automated, allowing the construction of training datasets consisting of hundreds of images per individual. Second, we describe how to train a CNN to uniquely re‐identify each individual in new images. Third, we illustrate the general applicability of CNNs for studies in animal biology by showing that trained CNNs can re‐identify individual birds in images collected in contexts that differ from the ones originally used to train the CNNs. Finally, we present a potential solution to solve the issues of new incoming individuals. Overall, our work demonstrates the feasibility of applying state‐of‐the‐art deep learning tools for individual identification of birds, both in the laboratory and in the wild. These techniques are made possible by our approaches that allow efficient collection of training data. The ability to conduct individual recognition of birds without requiring external markers that can be visually identified by human observers represents a major advance over current methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/2041-210x.13436

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deep learning models, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), have been developed to identify birds, bats or amphibians.

    “More recently, artificial intelligence deep learning models, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), have been developed to identify birds, bats or amphibians36–40.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Huang, G. B., Ramesh, M., Berg, T., & Learned-Miller, E. (2007). Labeled faces in the wild: A database for studying face recognition in uncon- strained environments. Technical Report (pp. 7-49). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.
  2. In D. Fleet, T. Pajdla, B. Schiele, & T. Tuytelaars (Eds.), European con- ference on computer vision (pp. 740-755). Cham: Springer.
  3. Sünderhauf, N., Neubert, P., & Protzel, P. (2013). Are we there yet? Challenging SeqSLAM on a 3000 km journey across all four sea- sons. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Workshop on Long-Term Autonomy. Karlsruhe, Germany: IEEE.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferreira, A. C., Silva, L. R., Renna, F., Brandl, H. B., Renoult, J. P., Farine, D. R., Covas, R., & Doutrelant, C.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • University of Konstanz (DE)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
Corresponding author
Ferreira, André C.
Venue
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-07-26
Volume
11
Issue
9
Pages
1072-1085
ISSN
2041-210X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3038699438
Cited by
203
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 6
FWCI
10.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Methods in Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (CEECIND/01970/2017, IF/01411/2014/CP1256/CT0007, PTDC/BIA‐EVF/5249/201, SFRH/BD/122106/2016)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR‐ 15‐CE32‐0012‐02, ANR 19‐CE02‐0014‐02)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FA 1402/4‐1, 422037984)
  • University of Cape Town
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
Keywords
individual recognition, small birds, convolutional neural networks, sociable weaver, Parus major, zebra finch, re-identification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review