Cited by 34

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reducing ER stress with chaperone therapy reverses sleep fragmentation and cognitive decline in aged mice

Hafycz, Jennifer M., Strus, Ewa, Naidoo, Nirinjini·2022·Aging Cell

Abstract

As the aging population grows, the need to understand age‐related changes in health is vital. Two prominent behavioral changes that occur with age are disrupted sleep and impaired cognition. Sleep disruptions lead to perturbations in proteostasis and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in mice. Further, consolidated sleep and protein synthesis are necessary for memory formation. With age, the molecular mechanisms that relieve cellular stress and ensure proper protein folding become less efficient. It is unclear if a causal relationship links proteostasis, sleep quality, and cognition in aging. Here, we used a mouse model of aging to determine if supplementing chaperone levels reduces ER stress and improves sleep quality and memory. We administered the chemical chaperone 4‐phenyl butyrate (PBA) to aged and young mice, and monitored sleep and cognitive behavior. We found that chaperone treatment consolidates sleep and wake, and improves learning in aged mice. These data correlate with reduced ER stress in the cortex and hippocampus of aged mice. Chaperone treatment increased p‐CREB, which is involved in memory formation and synaptic plasticity, in hippocampi of chaperone‐treated aged mice. Hippocampal overexpression of the endogenous chaperone, binding immunoglobulin protein (BiP), improved cognition, reduced ER stress, and increased p‐CREB in aged mice, suggesting that supplementing BiP levels are sufficient to restore some cognitive function. Together, these results indicate that restoring proteostasis improves sleep and cognition in a wild‐type mouse model of aging. The implications of these results could have an impact on the development of therapies to improve health span across the aging population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acel.13598

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 91

  1. 10.1016/j.conb.2013.04.008 · DOI
  2. 10.1073/pnas.0711863105 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0143416002001823 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/nprot.2006.205 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/j.1460‐2075.1996.tb00447.x · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0092‐8674(94)90400‐6 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.12.005 · DOI
  8. 10.3389/fphys.2012.00263 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/labinvest.2016.44 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0031‐9384(93)90148‐9 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/acel.12874 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.nbscr.2020.100049 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)03008-0 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.050 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/nrn2762 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1074/jbc.273.49.32377 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/cddis.2013.280 · DOI
  18. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21‐08‐02610.2001 · DOI
  19. 10.3389/fncel.2019.00383 · DOI
  20. 10.1152/jn.00882.2002 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/psyg.12319 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.01.106 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.08.034 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/nan.12211 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/cddis.2015.49 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.02.010 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.11.020 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.nlm.2007.09.010 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/nrn3689 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1038/s41580‐020‐0250‐z · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1111/febs.14422 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.01.156 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/prd.12126 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Kim J., 2007, Sodium butyrate regulates androgen receptor expression and cell cycle arrest in human prostate cancer cells, Anticancer Research, 27, 3285
  35. 10.1073/pnas.0605903103 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/978-1-4939-8994-2_10 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/s41593‐021‐00894‐6 · DOI
  38. 10.3389/fnagi.2011.00007 · DOI
  39. 10.1101/gad.964702 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/acer.13918 · DOI
  41. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007092 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1016/S0896‐6273(00)81085‐5 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1016/j.cub.2020.02.030 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/nn.3486 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.02.004 · DOI
  46. 10.1093/sleep/22.2.145 · DOI
  47. 10.1152/ajpregu.90765.2008 · DOI
  48. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0586‐04.2004 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/nature11058 · DOI
  50. 10.1093/sleep/30.5.557 · DOI
  51. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5685‐07.2008 · DOI
  52. 10.1111/j.1471‐4159.2004.02952.x · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.04.011 · DOI
  54. 10.1111/j.1474‐9726.2011.00699.x · DOI
  55. National Institute on Aging. N.I.o.H., 2007, Why population aging matters: A global perspective
  56. 10.1093/geronb/gbn037 · DOI
  57. 10.1001/archinte.162.2.201 · DOI
  58. 10.1093/sleep/zsab057 · DOI
  59. 10.1126/science.1128294 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1016/S1568‐1637(02)00014‐4 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.06.024 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.05.010 · DOI
  63. 10.5665/sleep.5236 · DOI
  64. 10.1007/s00401‐015‐1487‐z · DOI
  65. Ricobaraza A., 2011, Long‐term phenylbutyrate administration prevents memory deficits in Tg2576 mice by decreasing Abeta, Frontiers in Bioscience (Elite Ed), 3, 1375
  66. 10.1038/npp.2008.229 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1038/nrm2199 · DOI
  68. 10.1207/s15402010bsm0501_3 · DOI
  69. 10.1177/1073858418816611 · DOI
  70. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2343‐16.2017 · DOI
  71. 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.147155 · DOI
  72. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0628‐17.2017 · DOI
  73. 10.1038/s41598‐018‐30030‐7 · DOI
  74. 10.3389/fnsys.2019.00051 · DOI
  75. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400779 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.042 · DOI
  77. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2003.09.004 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1111/j.1742‐4658.2012.08535.x · DOI
  79. 10.1126/scisignal.aad4949 · DOI
  80. United Nations, D.o.E.a.S.A., Population Division, 2017, World Population Ageing 2017 ‐ Highlights In (ST/ESA/SER.A/397)
  81. 10.5665/sleep.6032 · DOI
  82. 10.1093/geronj/41.5.579 · DOI
  83. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.07.007 · DOI
  84. 10.1371/journal.pone.0081880 · DOI
  85. 10.1503/cmaj.060792 · DOI
  86. 10.1371/journal.pone.0079408 · DOI
  87. 10.7554/eLife.19358 · DOI
  88. 10.3390/nu8120728 · DOI
  89. 10.1159/000348349 · DOI
  90. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0857‐07.2007 · DOI
  91. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0275‐18.2018 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 34

Metadata

Authors
Hafycz, J. M., Strus, E., & Naidoo, N.
Affiliations
Chronobiology and Sleep Institute and Department of Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
Venue
Aging Cell
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-04-30
Volume
21
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1474-9718
  • 1474-9726
Cited by
34
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review