Cited by 234Schizophrenia research and treatmentAttachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

A systematic review of attachment and psychosis: measurement, construct validity and outcomes

Open access
Gumley, A. I., Taylor, H. E. F., Schwannauer, M., MacBeth, A.·2014·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

Objective: This review sought to identify, summarise and critically evaluate studies that investigated attachment amongst individuals with psychosis. Method: The following computerised databases searched were CINAHL < 1980 to D ecember 2012; EMBASE < 1980 to D ecember 2012; O vid MEDLINE (R) < 1980 to D ecember 2012; P sych INFO < 1980 to D ecember 2012; and G oogle S cholar < 1980 to D ecember 2012. Results: We identified 22 papers describing 21 studies comprising 1453 participants, with a mean age of 35.0 years (range of 12–71 years), of whom 68.4% (n = 994) were male. Of our sample, 1112 (76.5%) had a diagnosis of schizophrenia. We found small to moderate associations between greater attachment insecurity (as reflected in anxiety and avoidance) and poorer engagement with services, more interpersonal problems, more avoidant coping strategies, more negative appraisals of parenting experiences and more severe trauma. We also found small to modest associations between attachment insecurity and more positive and negative symptoms and greater affective symptom problems. Conclusion: Attachment theory may be useful as a means of understanding the developmental and interpersonal basis of recovery and adaptation in the context of psychosis. However, further research comprising more representative samples in their first episode and using prospective designs is required.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acps.12172

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Paranoia is associated with insecure attachment.

    “many studies have reported a strong association between insecure attachment styles and paranoia in both clinical and non‐clinical samples (Carr, Hardy, & Fornells‐Ambrojo, 2018; Gumley, Taylor, Schwannauer, & MacBeth, 2014; Pickering, Simpson, & Bentall, 2008;”

    From Mistrust and negative self‐esteem: Two paths from attachment styles to paranoia. (2021) · cites this paper as Gumley, Taylor, Schwannauer, & MacBeth, 2014

    The review reports an association between attachment avoidance and paranoia in its Dimensions of outcome section, supporting the core claim for clinical samples. But its Inclusion and exclusion criteria explicitly exclude non-clinical/analogue studies, so it cannot support the sentence’s extension to non-clinical samples. The review also describes the broader symptom associations as small to moderate rather than uniformly strong. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gumley, A. I., Taylor, H. E. F., Schwannauer, M., & MacBeth, A.
Affiliations
  • NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Gumley, A. I.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-07-03
Volume
129
Issue
4
Pages
257-274
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2001779377
Cited by
234
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
attachment, psychosis, insecure attachment, schizophrenia, attachment theory, service engagement, interpersonal problems, avoidance coping, parental experiences, trauma, positive and negative symptoms, affective symptoms, attachment measurement, construct validity
MeSH terms
Humans, Object Attachment, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review