Cited by 41Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatmentChild Abuse and Trauma

The role of attachment anxiety in the relationship between childhood trauma and schizophrenia-spectrum psychosis

Chatziioannidis, Stylianos, Andreou, Christina, Agorastos, Agorastos, Kaprinis, Stergios, Malliaris, Yanni, Garyfallos, George, Bozikas, Vasilios P.·2019·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Childhood trauma (CT) is a comprehensive concept encompassing experiences of sexual, physical, and emotional abuse, and neglect during childhood and adolescence. Patients with schizophrenia-spectrum psychosis (SSP) display higher rates of CT than healthy controls. Among the potential mediators of this association, insecure attachment has gained attention and empirical validation. The present study aimed to extend existing knowledge on this field by exploring the role of the two attachment dimensions, attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance, in the CT-SSP association. A clinical sample of 63 SSP inpatients was compared to a healthy control group on CT and attachment style measures. Correlations between CT, attachment dimensions and psychopathology were sought. Mediation analyses were also performed to examine whether attachment anxiety and/or attachment avoidance mediated the CT-SSP association. Patients displayed higher rates of CT and insecure attachment than controls. Attachment anxiety and severity of Mother Antipathy were linked to severity of hallucinations. Attachment anxiety was recognized as the sole mediator of the CT-SSP association. Our findings suggest that individuals with severe CT and increased attachment anxiety represent a risk population warranting early clinical attention, regular monitoring and tailored therapeutic interventions aimed at reducing the psychological impact of trauma.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.05.021

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 94 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chatziioannidis, S., Andreou, C., Agorastos, A., Kaprinis, S., Malliaris, Y., Garyfallos, G., & Bozikas, V. P.
Affiliations
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
  • Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
Chatziioannidis, Stylianos
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
276
Pages
223-231
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2943943387
Cited by
41
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
childhood trauma, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, insecure attachment, hallucinations, mediation, trauma exposure
MeSH terms
Adult Survivors of Child Adverse Events, Adult, Anxiety, Female, Hallucinations, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Object Attachment, Psychopathology, Psychotic Disorders, Risk Factors, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review