Cited by 71

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using step‐selection functions to model landscape connectivity for African elephants: accounting for variability across individuals and seasons

Osipova, L., Okello, M. M., Njumbi, S. J., Ngene, S., Western, D., Hayward, M. W., Balkenhol, N.·2019·Animal Conservation

Abstract

Landscape connectivity is an important component of systematic conservation planning. Step‐selection functions (SSFs) is a highly promising method for connectivity modeling. However, differences in movement behavior across individuals and seasons are usually not considered in current SSF‐based analyses, potentially leading to imprecise connectivity models. Here, our objective was to use SSFs to build functional connectivity models for African elephants Loxodonta africana in a seasonal environment to illustrate the temporal variability of functional landscape connectivity. We provide a methodological framework for integrating detected inter‐individual variability into resistance surface modeling, for assessing how landscape connectivity changes across seasons, and for evaluating how seasonal connectivity differences affect predictions of movement corridors. Using radio‐tracking data from elephants in the Borderland area between Kenya and Tanzania, we applied SSFs to create seasonal landscape resistance surfaces. Based on seasonal models, we predicted movement corridors connecting major protected areas (PAs) using circuit theory and least‐cost path analysis. Our findings demonstrate that individual variability and seasonality lead to substantial changes in landscape connectivity and predicted movement corridors. Specifically, we show that the models disregarding seasonal resource fluctuations underestimate connectivity for the wet and transitional seasons, and overestimate connectivity for the dry season. Based on our seasonal models, we predicted a connectivity network between large PAs and highlight seasonal and consistent patterns that are most important for effective management planning. Our findings reveal that elephant movements in the borderland between Kenya and Tanzania are essential for maintaining connectivity in the dry season, and that existing corridors do not protect these movements in full extent.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acv.12432

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Seasonal variability in the landscape can substantially alter movement patterns.

    “For example, seasonal variability in the landscape can substantially alter movement patterns42,43, and spatial variability in movement behaviour can result in radically different estimates of landscape resistance and connectivity44,45.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 74

  1. 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00242-6 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1371/journal.pone.0052288 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00896.x · DOI
  4. 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.2307/1937036 · DOI
  6. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07030602.x · DOI
  7. 10.1002/ece3.3122 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s10980-007-9108-4 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00942.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1371/journal.pone.0162989 · DOI
  11. 10.1371/journal.pone.0038363 · DOI
  12. 10.1186/2051-3933-2-2 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.009 · DOI
  14. Brooker L., 1999, Animal dispersal in fragmented habitat: measuring habitat connectivity, corridor use, and dispersal mortality, Conserv. Ecol., 3
  15. 10.1034/j.1600-0579.2003.11511.x · DOI
  16. 10.1002/wsb.296 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01753.x · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01670.x · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00773.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)69[1346:QHOTIO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  21. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0079 · DOI
  22. 10.1890/08-0874.1 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/BF00133027 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s00442-005-0122-4 · DOI
  25. 10.3389/fevo.2016.00144 · DOI
  26. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0087 · DOI
  27. Hijmans R. J., 2016, raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling
  28. 10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[347:RSFBOU]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s10980-016-0387-5 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Kikoti A.(2009).Seasonal home range sizes transboundary movements and conservation of elephants in Northern Tanzania. PhD thesis University of Massachusetts Amherst.
  31. 10.1186/s40462-014-0015-4 · DOI
  32. KWS, TAWIR Report, 2013, KWS & TAWIRI. Aerial total count: Amboseli‐West Kilimanjaro and Magadi‐Natron cross border landscape
  33. 10.1016/j.baae.2017.02.005 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Manly B.F.J., 2002, Resource selection by animals: statistical analysis and design for field studies
  35. 10.1038/35012251 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1007/s10980-015-0194-4 · DOI
  37. McRae B.H., 2011, Linkage mapper connectivity analysis software
  38. McRae B., 2008, Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology and conservation, Ecology, 10, 271
  39. 10.1098/rspb.2016.0456 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/s00442-016-3751-x · DOI
  41. 10.1007/s10980-016-0456-9 · DOI
  42. Ngene S.M.(2010).Why elephant roam. PhD thesis University of Twente.
  43. Ngene S., 2014, Satellite‐linked GPS collars deployed on elephants in Tsavo Ecosystem, Kenya, J. Curr. Issues Media Telecommun., 6, 127
  44. 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.07.008 · DOI
  45. 10.5897/IJBC2014.0795 · DOI
  46. 10.1098/rspb.2014.3042 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.001 · DOI
  48. Quaglietta L., 2018, SiMRiv: individual‐based, spatially‐explicit simulation and analysis of multi‐state movements in river networks and heterogeneous landscapes
  49. 10.1086/424767 · DOI
  50. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01806.x · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.025 · DOI
  52. 10.1111/eva.12389 · DOI
  53. Rudnick D.A., 2012, The role of landscape connectivity in planning and implementing conservation and restoration priorities
  54. 10.1002/jwmg.407 · DOI
  55. 10.1002/wsb.539 · DOI
  56. 10.1002/ecs2.1771 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.patrec.2008.10.015 · DOI
  58. Space For Giants Report, 2015, Situation assessment of human‐elephant conflict in the Greater Amboseli Ecosystem
  59. 10.1186/2051-3933-2-4 · DOI
  60. 10.1086/321318 · DOI
  61. Venables W.N., 2013, Modern applied statistics with S‐PLUS
  62. 10.1007/s10980-006-9013-2 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.11.001 · DOI
  64. Wall J.C.(2015).Geospatial analysis of African elephant movement (Loxodonta africana and L. cyclotis). PhD thesis The University of British Columbia.
  65. 10.1111/j.1365-2028.1975.tb00139.x · DOI
  66. 10.1038/nature01566 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1111/j.1365-2028.2006.00710.x · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.tree.2012.05.001 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/S0959-8049(96)00244-4 · DOI
  70. 10.1007/s10980-012-9737-0 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1007/s10980-015-0301-6 · DOI
  72. 10.1007/s10980-017-0489-8 · DOI
  73. 10.1007/s10980-016-0368-8 · DOI
  74. 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2009.00001.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Osipova, L., Okello, M. M., Njumbi, S. J., Ngene, S., Western, D., Hayward, M. W., & Balkenhol, N.
Affiliations
  • Wildlife Sciences University of Goettingen Goettingen Germany
  • Department of Tourism Management Moi University Nairobi Kenya
  • International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) Nairobi Kenya
  • Kenya Wildlife Service Nairobi Kenya
  • African Conservation Centre Nairobi Kenya
  • The University of Newcastle Newcastle NSW Australia
Venue
Animal Conservation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-07-02
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
35-48
ISSN
  • 1367-9430
  • 1469-1795
Cited by
71
References
3
Language
en
Funders
European Commission under the Erasmus Mundus Joint Doctorate Programme (FONASO)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review