The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 7 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Circuitscape: A Tool for Landscape Ecology
Open accessAbstract
The modeling of ecological connectivity across networks and landscapes is an active research area that spans the disciplines of ecology, conservation, and population genetics. Recently, concepts and algorithms from electrical circuit theory have been adapted to address these problems. The approach is based on linkages between circuit and random walk theories, and has several advantages over previous analytic approaches, including incorporation of multiple dispersal pathways into analyses. Here we describe Circuitscape, a computational tool developed for modeling landscape connectivity using circuit theory. Our Python implementation can quickly solve networks with millions of nodes, or landscapes with millions of raster cells.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Circuitscape is a Python computational tool that applies electrical circuit theory to landscape ecology, modeling connectivity by solving for effective resistance, current, and voltage across large graphs. In synthetic tests it solved up to 6 million nodes, with larger problems limited by memory.
Key findings
- Circuitscape converts raster landscapes into graphs, with each cell as a node and edges to 4 or 8 neighbors; current densities indicate the probability of a random walker passing through cells, and effective resistance measures connectivity/redundancy.
- On a synthetic landscape, performance scaled as follows: 1M nodes — build graph 3 sec, components 5 sec, AMG setup 4 sec, linear solve 9 sec; 6M nodes — 14 sec, 27 sec, 31 sec, 82 sec.
- The largest problem solved had 6 million nodes; a 12-million-node problem failed with memory allocation failure “even though we believe we have sufficient memory.”
- Sparse direct Cholesky factorization was prohibitive for large grids; the paper reports, for example, 12 million cells requiring 390 million fill entries and 200 GigaFlops, and 48 million cells requiring 1800 million fill entries and 1700 GigaFlops.
Methods
- Design: Circuitscape reads a raster conductance map, constructs a sparse graph, contracts habitat patches into single nodes, prunes disconnected components, and forms a graph Laplacian with grounded destination nodes to solve for resistance, current, and voltage.
- Data/sample: Performance was tested on a synthetic landscape made by tiling smaller problems; the paper also describes typical landscape extents and resolutions, e.g., a 100 km² area at 100 m cells yields 10,000 nodes, California yields 40 million nodes, and Yellowstone-to-Yukon at 100 m yields 120 million nodes.
- Analysis: Small to moderate problems use direct methods such as Cholesky factorization; large problems use preconditioned conjugate gradient with an algebraic multigrid preconditioner. The Python implementation uses numpy, scipy sparse formats (coordinate and CSR), scipy’s conjugate gradient solver, pyamg, and a custom graph processing module.
Limitations
- The paper states that larger problems appear restricted by memory; the 12-million-node case failed with memory allocation failure, and the authors are investigating tools to reduce memory footprint.
- The performance results are from a synthetic problem that “does not represent a real application scenario,” though it tests scaling.
- The Python implementation is not yet parallelized; the authors are working on task parallelism and parallelizing the linear solver, and direct methods are described as prohibitive for large problems.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 7 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingreasoning
The landscape graph is extremely sparse because every cell has at most 4 or 8 neighbors.
“This graph is extremely sparse due to the fact that every cell has at most 4 or 8 neighbors, even though the landscape may be extremely large.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The space requirements of Cholesky factorization are prohibitive in practice for large problems.
“Although the space requirements seem modest asymptotically, they are prohibitive in practice for large problems, as shown in the table below.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The largest problem Circuitscape could solve had 6 million nodes.
“The largest problem we could solve had 6 million nodes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
On a problem twice as large (12 million nodes), Circuitscape encountered memory allocation failure.
“On a problem twice as large (12 million), we notice memory allocation failure (even though we believe we have sufficient memory).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The number of floating point operations for the largest problems is prohibitive.
“The number of floating point operations for the largest problems is also prohibitive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Study design and conductreasoning
Circuitscape prunes disconnected parts of the landscape by running a connected components algorithm.
“We prune the disconnected parts of the landscape by running a connected components algorithm on the landscape graph.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The circuit-theory approach to ecological connectivity is based on linkages between circuit and random walk theories.
“The approach is based on linkages between circuit and random walk theories”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · boosted
“In addition, rigorous connections between circuit and random walk theories [Doy84] mean that current, voltage, and resistance in electrical circuits all have concrete interpretations in terms of individual movement probabilities [Mcr08].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [Doy84]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [Mcr08]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § Introduction · boosted
- Premisecitation
Concepts and algorithms from electrical circuit theory have been adapted to model ecological connectivity across networks and landscapes.
“Recently, concepts and algorithms from electrical circuit theory have been adapted to address these problems.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“Recently, concepts and algorithms from electrical circuit theory have been adapted for these purposes ( [Mcr06], [Mcr08]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [Mcr06]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [Mcr08]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
- Premisereasoning
Multiple or wider habitat swaths connecting populations or habitats allow greater movement between them than a single, narrow habitat swath.
“as multiple or wider conductors connecting two electrical nodes allow greater current flow than would a single, narrow conductor, multiple or wider habitat swaths connecting populations or habitats allow greater movement between them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Current, voltage, and resistance in electrical circuits have concrete interpretations in terms of individual movement probabilities.
“rigorous connections between circuit and random walk theories [Doy84] mean that current, voltage, and resistance in electrical circuits all have concrete interpretations in terms of individual movement probabilities [Mcr08].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [Doy84]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [Mcr08]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductreasoning
Circuitscape ensures that the source and destination habitat patches are in the same connected component.
“Circuitscape ensures that the source and destination habitat patches are in the same component, and it can iterate over source destination pairs in disjoint pieces of the landscape.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Larger problems than 6 million nodes appear to be restricted by memory.
“We can solve problems with 6 million nodes, but larger problems appear to be restricted by memory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Effective resistances calculated across landscapes have been shown to markedly improve predictions of gene flow for plant and animal species.
“for example, effective resistances calculated across landscapes have been shown to markedly improve predictions of gene flow for plant and animal species [Mcr07].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [Mcr07]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
The circuit-theory approach has advantages over previous analytic approaches, including incorporation of multiple dispersal pathways into analyses.
“The approach is based on linkages between circuit and random walk theories, and has several advantages over previous analytic approaches, including incorporation of multiple dispersal pathways into analyses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Probably not a substantial claim. 8
- It may state two separate claims as one. 1
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenThe authors were unable to find a library that suited their needs for graph operations at scale.
“We searched for libraries that would let us perform graph operations at scale, and were unable to find one that suited our needs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
FindingreasoningA graph that is connected with 8 neighbors per cell may not be connected with 4 neighbors per cell.
“A graph that is connected with 8 neighbors per cell may not be connected with 4 neighbors per cell.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenCircuitscape's Python implementation can quickly solve networks with millions of nodes, or landscapes with millions of raster cells.
“Our Python implementation can quickly solve networks with millions of nodes, or landscapes with millions of raster cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenThe Matlab version of Circuitscape parallelized effortlessly with Star-P.
“The Matlab version of Circuitscape parallelized effortlessly with Star-P (Interactive Supercomputing, Waltham, Massachussetts, USA).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
FindingreasoningThe choice of neighbor connectivity can affect connectivity of the resulting graph.
“The choice of neighbor connectivity can affect connectivity of the resulting graph.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone givenThe analysis for the 2D model problem holds for matrices generated from landscapes represented as 2D grids.
“The analysis for the 2D model problem holds for matrices generated from landscapes represented as 2D grids.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductreasoningThe synthetic problem tests the scaling of Circuitscape's algorithms and code on large problem sizes.
“While this does not represent a real application scenario, it does test the scaling of our algorithms and code on large problem sizes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenThe synthetic problem does not represent a real application scenario.
“While this does not represent a real application scenario, it does test the scaling of our algorithms and code on large problem sizes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
Edges in the landscape graph are undirected, implying that dispersal is balanced.
“Edges are assumed to be undirected, which implies that dispersal is balanced.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Circuitscape software is often unable to compute grids larger than 6 million cells because of computer memory limitations.
“Because of computer memory limitations, Circuitscape software is often unable to compute grids larger than 6 million cells (Shah & McRae 2008), ultimately restricting the size of the buffer.”
From Landscape connectivity for wildlife: development and validation of multispecies linkage maps (2014) · cites this paper as Shah & McRae 2008
Citations
Cites
USING CIRCUIT THEORY TO MODEL CONNECTIVITY IN ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION, AND CONSERVATION
McRae, B. H., Dickson, B. G., Keitt, T. H., & Shah, V. B. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-1861.1 · Cited by 2,244
Self-citationMcRae, B. H. (2006) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00500.x · Cited by 1,081
Self-citationCircuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations
McRae, B. H., & Beier, P. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0706568104 · Cited by 945
Self-citationMcRae, B. H. (2006) · Evolution · doi:10.1554/05-321.1 · Cited by 900
Self-citationThe electrical resistance of a graph captures its commute and cover times
Chandra, A. K., Raghavan, P., Ruzzo, W. L., Smolensky, R., & Tiwari, P. (1996) · Computational Complexity · doi:10.1007/bf01270385 · Cited by 328
Random walks and electrical networks
Lawler, G. F., & Coyle, L. N. (1999) · Student mathematical library · doi:10.1090/stml/002/09 · Cited by 261
Gilbert, J. R., & Shah, V. B. (2007) · Cited by 27
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Crooks, K. R. and Sanjayan M. (eds). 2006. Connectivity Conservation. Cambridge Univer- sity Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thompson, P. L., Rayfield, B., & Gonzalez, A. (2016) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.02558 · Cited by 302
Landscape connectivity for wildlife: development and validation of multispecies linkage maps
Koen, E. L., Bowman, J., Sadowski, C., & Walpole, A. A. (2014) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12197 · Cited by 293
Howey, M. C. L. (2011) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2011.03.024 · Cited by 168
Pelletier, D., Clark, M., Anderson, M. G., Rayfield, B., Wulder, M. A., & Cardille, J. A. (2014) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084135 · Cited by 158
Fardila, D., Kelly, L. T., Moore, J. L., & Mccarthy, M. A. (2017) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.031 · Cited by 154
The effect of map boundary on estimates of landscape resistance to animal movement
Koen, E. L., Garroway, C. J., Wilson, P. J., & Bowman, J. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011785 · Cited by 148
Paz, A., Ibáñez, R., Lips, K. R., & Crawford, A. J. (2015) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.13275 · Cited by 142
Omniscape.jl: software to compute omnidirectional landscape connectivity
Landau, V., Shah, V., Anantharaman, R., & Hall, K. (2021) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.02829 · Cited by 139
Self-citationHe, Q., Edwards, D. L., & Knowles, L. L. (2013) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12159 · Cited by 130
Dilts, T. E., Weisberg, P. J., Leitner, P., Matocq, M. D., Inman, R. D., Nussear, K. E., & Esque, T. C. (2015) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/15-0925 · Cited by 112
Barbosa, S., Mestre, F., White, T. A., Paupério, J., Alves, P. C., & Searle, J. B. (2018) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.14806 · Cited by 99
A resilient and connected network of sites to sustain biodiversity under a changing climate
Anderson, M. G., Clark, M. M., Olivero, A. P., Barnett, A., Hall, K. R., Cornett, M. W., Ahlering, M., Schindel, M., Unnasch, B., Schloss, C. A., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2204434119 · Cited by 90
gflow: software for modelling circuit theory‐based connectivity at any scale
Leonard, P. B., Duffy, E. B., Baldwin, R. F., McRae, B. H., Shah, V. B., & Mohapatra, T. K. (2017) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12689 · Cited by 77
Self-citationOsipova, L., Okello, M. M., Njumbi, S. J., Ngene, S., Western, D., Hayward, M. W., & Balkenhol, N. (2019) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1111/acv.12432 · Cited by 71
Using landscape connectivity to predict human-wildlife conflict
Buchholtz, E. K., Stronza, A. L., Songhurst, A., McCulloch, G. P., & Fitzgerald, L. A. (2020) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108677 · Cited by 75
Ziółkowska, E., Perzanowski, K., Bleyhl, B., Ostapowicz, K., & Kuemmerle, T. (2016) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.032 · Cited by 68
Epps, C. W., Wasser, S. K., Keim, J. L., Mutayoba, B. M., & Brashares, J. S. (2013) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.12198 · Cited by 65
Landscape connectivity losses due to sea level rise and land use change
Leonard, P. B., Sutherland, R., Baldwin, R. F., Fedak, D. A., Carnes, R., & Montgomery, A. P. (2016) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1111/acv.12289 · Cited by 63
Brunker, K., Lemey, P., Marston, D. A., Fooks, A. R., Lugelo, A., Ngeleja, C., Hampson, K., & Biek, R. (2017) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.14470 · Cited by 63
Beninde, J., Feldmeier, S., Veith, M., & Hochkirch, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2018.0143 · Cited by 59
Predicting areas important for ecological connectivity throughout Canada
Pither, R., O’Brien, P., Brennan, A., Hirsh‐Pearson, K., & Bowman, J. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0281980 · Cited by 56
Genetic diversity and gene flow decline with elevation in montane mayflies
Polato, N. R., Gray, M. M., Gill, B. A., Becker, C., Casner, K. L., Flecker, A. S., Kondratieff, B. C., Encalada, A. C., Poff, N. L., Funk, W. C., et al. (2017) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2017.23 · Cited by 56
Identifying priority landscapes for conservation of snow leopards in Pakistan
Hameed, S., Din, J. U., Ali, H., Kabir, M., Younas, M. U., Rehman, E. U., Bari, F., Wang, H., Bischof, R., & Nawaz, M. A. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228832 · Cited by 52
Toczydlowski, R. H., & Waller, D. M. (2019) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.15072 · Cited by 51
Arbeláez‐Cortés, E., Milá, B., & Navarro-Sigüenza, A. G. (2013) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2013.10.006 · Cited by 50
Ayram, C. A. C., Mendoza, M. E., Pérez‐Salicrup, D. R., & Granados, E. M. L. (2014) · Journal for Nature Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2014.03.010 · Cited by 43
Monsimet, J., Devineau, O., Pétillon, J., & Lafage, D. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73262-2 · Cited by 43
Wachter, G. A., Papadopoulou, A., Muster, C., Arthofer, W., Knowles, L. L., Steiner, F. M., & Schlick-Steiner, B. C. (2016) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.13634 · Cited by 41
Bishop‐Taylor, R., Tulbure, M. G., & Broich, M. (2017) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.029 · Cited by 41
Predicting migration routes for three species of migratory bats using species distribution models
Wieringa, J. G., Carstens, B. C., & Gibbs, H. L. (2021) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.11177 · Cited by 41
Estrada-Carmona, N., Martínez‐Salinas, A., DeClerck, F., Vilchez-Mendoza, S. J., & Garbach, K. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109504 · Cited by 40
Mignotte, A., Garros, C., Dellicour, S., Jacquot, M., Gilbert, M., Gardès, L., Balenghien, T., Duhayon, M., Rakotoarivony, I., de Wavrechin, M., et al. (2021) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/s13071-020-04522-3 · Cited by 40
An evaluation tool for backbone extraction techniques in weighted complex networks
Yassin, A., Haidar, A., Cherifi, H., Seba, H., & Togni, O. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-42076-3 · Cited by 37
Zhang, L., Wan, Y.-W., Sun, Y., Guoyu, H., Lei, X., Wei, X., & Jin, G. (2025) · Applied Geography · doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103535 · Cited by 37
Li, Z., Chang, J., Li, C., & Gu, S. (2023) · Land · doi:10.3390/land12020442 · Cited by 37
Favre‐Bac, L., Mony, C., Ernoult, A., Burel, F., & Arnaud, J. (2015) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2015.90 · Cited by 34
Amaral, K. E., Palace, M., O’Brien, K. M., Fenderson, L. E., & Kovach, A. I. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148842 · Cited by 34
Papadopoulou, A., & Knowles, L. L. (2017) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.13384 · Cited by 34
Prediction and Prevention of Parasitic Diseases Using a Landscape Genomics Framework
Schwabl, P., Llewellyn, M. S., Landguth, E. L., Andersson, B., Kitron, U. D., Costales, J. A., Ocaña-Mayorga, S., & Grijalva, M. J. (2016) · Trends in Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.pt.2016.10.008 · Cited by 32
Dudaniec, R. Y., Carey, A. R., SVENSSON, E. I., Hansson, B., Yong, C., & Lancaster, L. T. (2021) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13488 · Cited by 32
Suksavate, ., Duengkae, P., & Chaiyes, A. (2019) · Global Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00685 · Cited by 31
Pan, L., Gan, W., Chen, J., & Ren, K. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15054487 · Cited by 31
Behavior and population structure of Anopheles darlingi in Colombia
Naranjo-Díaz, N., Conn, J. E., & Correa, M. M. (2016) · Infection Genetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2016.01.004 · Cited by 31
Herrera‐Pérez, J., Parra, J. L., Restrepo-Santamaría, D., & Jiménez-Segura, L. F. (2019) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2019.00009 · Cited by 30
Rhizosphere hydrophobicity: A positive trait in the competition for water
Zeppenfeld, T., Balkenhol, N., Kóvacs, K., & Carminati, A. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182188 · Cited by 30
Koch, J. B. U., Vandame, R., Mérida‐Rivas, J., Sagot, P., & Strange, J. P. (2018) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.4294 · Cited by 29
Habitat Disturbance Linked with Host Microbiome Dispersion and Bd Dynamics in Temperate Amphibians
Neely, W. J., Greenspan, S. E., Stahl, L. M., Heraghty, S. D., Marshall, V. M., Atkinson, C. L., & Becker, C. G. (2021) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s00248-021-01897-3 · Cited by 29
Drielsma, M., Love, J., Taylor, S., Thapa, R., & Williams, K. J. (2022) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109858 · Cited by 28
Bani, L., Pisa, G., Luppi, M., Spilotros, G., Fabbri, E., Randi, E., & Orioli, V. (2015) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.1617 · Cited by 28
Rugged adaptive landscapes shape a complex, sympatric radiation
Pfaender, J., Hadiaty, R. K., Schliewen, U. K., & Herder, F. (2016) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.2342 · Cited by 28
Westekemper, K., Tiesmeyer, A., Steyer, K., Nowak, C., Signer, J., & Balkenhol, N. (2021) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.7635 · Cited by 28
Fant, J. B., Havens, K., Keller, J. M., Radosavljević, A., & Yates, E. D. (2014) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2013.134 · Cited by 27
Paemelaere, E. A. D., Mejía, Á., Quintero, S., Hallett, M. T., Li, F., Wilson, A., Barnabas, H., Albert, A., Li, R., Baird, L., et al. (2022) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2022.107010 · Cited by 26
Garcia, V. O. S., Ivy, C., & Fu, J. (2017) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.3459 · Cited by 25
Exploiting Genetic Information to Trace Plant Virus Dispersal in Landscapes
Picard, C., Dallot, S., Brunker, K., Berthier, K., Roumagnac, P., Soubeyrand, S., Jacquot, E., & Thébaud, G. (2017) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035616 · Cited by 25
Alvarado‐Serrano, D. F., Etten, M. L. V., Chang, S., & Baucom, R. S. (2018) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/s41437-018-0106-x · Cited by 25
Assessing habitat connectivity of rare species to inform urban conservation planning
McCluskey, E. M., Kuzma, F. C., Enander, H. D., Cole-Wick, A. A., Coury, M., Cuthrell, D. L., Johnson, C. A., Kelso, M., Lee, Y. M., Methner, D., et al. (2024) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.11105 · Cited by 24
Fuchs, J., Parra, J. L., Goodman, S. M., Raherilalao, M. J., VanDerWal, J. J., & Bowie, R. C. K. (2013) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2012.02022.x · Cited by 24
Epps, C. W., Vardaro, J. A. C., Schmidt‐Küntzel, A., du Preez, P., Stuart‐Hill, G., Jago, M., & Naidoo, R. (2013) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/ess142 · Cited by 24
Johnson, J. S., Gaddis, K. D., Cairns, D. M., Konganti, K., & Krutovsky, K. V. (2017) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.1600262 · Cited by 23
Cowley, D. J., Johnson, O., & Pocock, M. J. O. (2015) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-015-0168-6 · Cited by 22
An, Y., Liu, S., Sun, Y., Shi, F., & Zhao, S. (2019) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102766 · Cited by 22
Buglione, M., Petrelli, S., Troiano, C., Notomista, T., Petrella, A., Riso, L. D., Poerio, L., Cascini, V., Bartolomei, R., & Fulgione, D. (2020) · Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde · doi:10.1163/18759866-bja10012 · Cited by 22
Ihlow, F., Bonke, R., Hartmann, T., Geißler, P., Behler, N., & Rödder, D. (2014) · Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems · doi:10.1002/aqc.2473 · Cited by 22
Forest Connectivity Regions of Canada Using Circuit Theory and Image Analysis
Pelletier, D., Lapointe, M.-É., Wulder, M. A., White, J. C., & Cardille, J. A. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169428 · Cited by 22
Beazley, K., Hum, J. D., & Lemieux, C. J. (2023) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110286 · Cited by 20
Menchaca, A., Rossi, N. A., Froidevaux, J. S. P., Dias-Freedman, I., Caragiulo, A., Wultsch, C., Harmsen, B. J., Foster, R. J., de la Torre, J. A., Medellín, R. A., et al. (2019) · BMC Genetics · doi:10.1186/s12863-019-0801-5 · Cited by 20
Ntie, S., Davis, A. R., Hils, K., Mickala, P., Thomassen, H. A., Morgan, K., Vanthomme, H., Gonder, M. K., & Anthony, N. M. (2017) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/s12862-017-1054-4 · Cited by 20
Reduced habitat suitability and landscape connectivity in a songbird migratory divide
Justen, H. C., Lee‐Yaw, J. A., & Delmore, K. E. (2021) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/geb.13367 · Cited by 19
Isolation by marine barriers and climate explain areas of endemism in an island rodent
Giarla, T. C., Maher, S. P., Achmadi, A. S., Moore, M., Swanson, M. T., Rowe, K. C., & Esselstyn, J. A. (2018) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.13392 · Cited by 19
Hirschfeld, M., Barnett, A., Sheaves, M. J., & Dudgeon, C. L. (2023) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/s41437-023-00635-4 · Cited by 18
Population dynamics of Anopheles nuneztovari in Colombia
Naranjo-Díaz, N., Sallum, M. A. M., & Correa, M. M. (2016) · Infection Genetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2016.08.019 · Cited by 18
The effect of fauna passages and landscape characteristics on barrier mitigation success
Karlson, M., Seiler, A., & Mörtberg, U. M. (2017) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.04.059 · Cited by 17
Modelling patch mosaic connectivity and ecological corridors with GraphScape
Pomianowski, W., & Solon, J. (2020) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104757 · Cited by 17
Exploring structural and functional corridors for wild sheep (Ovis orientalis) in a semi-arid area
Momeni‐Dehaghi, I., Soffianian, A., Hemami, M., Pourmanafi, S., Salmanmahiny, A., & Wu, G. (2018) · Journal of Arid Environments · doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2018.04.009 · Cited by 16
Advancing Biogeography Through Population Genomics
Johnson, J. S., Krutovsky, K. V., Rajora, O. P., Gaddis, K. D., & Cairns, D. M. (2018) · Population genomics · doi:10.1007/13836_2018_39 · Cited by 16
Li, Y., Peng, Y., Li, H., Zhu, W., Darman, Y. A., Lee, D. K., Wang, T., Sedash, G. A., Pandey, P., Borzée, A., et al. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0264660 · Cited by 15
Métodos de análisis genéticos, espaciales y de conectividad en genética del paisaje
Garrido-Garduño, T., & Vázquez‐Domínguez, E. (2013) · Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad · doi:10.7550/rmb.32500 · Cited by 14
Miller, M. P., Davis, R. J., Forsman, E. D., Mullins, T. D., & Haig, S. M. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0201720 · Cited by 14
Laner, P., Rossi, C., Luethi, R., Favilli, F., Bertoncelj, I., Plassmann, G., & Haller, R. M. (2024) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112145 · Cited by 13
Wildlife Population Genomics: Applications and Approaches
Barbosa, S., Hendricks, S. A., Funk, W. C., Rajora, O. P., & Hohenlohe, P. A. (2020) · Population genomics · doi:10.1007/13836_2020_83 · Cited by 13
Landscape genetic inferences vary with sampling scenario for a pond‐breeding amphibian
Seaborn, T., Hauser, S. S., Konrade, L. A., Waits, L. P., & Goldberg, C. S. (2019) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.5023 · Cited by 13
Genetic differentiation and habitat connectivity across towhee hybrid zones in Mexico
Kingston, S. E., Navarro-Sigüenza, A. G., García-Trejo, E. A., Vázquez‐Miranda, H., Fagan, W. F., & Braun, M. J. (2013) · Evolutionary Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10682-013-9673-8 · Cited by 13
Hernandez-Castro, L. E., Villacís, A. G., Jacobs, A., Cheaib, B. A., Day, C. C., Ocaña-Mayorga, S., Yumiseva, C. A., Bacigalupo, A., Andersson, B., Matthews, L., et al. (2022) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1010019 · Cited by 12
Ellwanger, C., Steger, L., Pollack, C., Wells, R. L., & Fant, J. B. (2022) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.8578 · Cited by 11
Eberle, J., Rödder, D., Beckett, M., & AHRENS, D. C. (2017) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13616 · Cited by 11
Evans, M. J., Rittenhouse, T. A. G., Hawley, J. E., Rego, P. W., & Eggert, L. S. (2018) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.4033 · Cited by 11
Genetic structure in neotropical birds with different tolerance to urbanization
Rodríguez-Bardía, M., Fuchs, E. J., Barrantes, G., Madrigal‐Brenes, R., & Sandoval, L. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-09961-9 · Cited by 11
Acevedo, C. A. C., Rodríguez‐Durán, A., & Soto‐Centeno, J. A. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-88616-7 · Cited by 10
High-throughput computing provides substantial time savings for landscape and conservation planning
Leonard, P. B., Baldwin, R. F., Duffy, E., Lipscomb, D. J., & Rose, A. M. (2014) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.016 · Cited by 10
Tracking a blue wave of ephemeral water across arid southern Africa
Schaffer‐Smith, D., Swift, M., Killea, A., Brennan, A., Naidoo, R., & Swenson, J. J. (2022) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac98d9 · Cited by 10
Kelly, D. R., Clark, M. M., Palace, M., & Howey, M. C. L. (2023) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2022.105710 · Cited by 9
Climatic dissimilarity associated with phylogenetic breaks
Cab-Sulub, L., & Álvarez-Castañeda, S. T. (2021) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyab108 · Cited by 9
Adhya, T., Bagaria, P., Dey, P. P., Muñoz, V. H., Ratnayaka, A. A. W., Thudugala, A., Aravind, N. A., & Sanderson, J. G. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.01.16.476498 · Cited by 9
Storfer, A. T. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-384719-5.00386-5 · Cited by 9
Habrich, A. K., & Fahrig, L. (2025) · Current Landscape Ecology Reports · doi:10.1007/s40823-025-00106-y · Cited by 8
Yuan, W., Shan, R., & Li, J. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20065181 · Cited by 8
de Flamingh, A., Alexander, N. B., Perrin-Stowe, T. I. N., Donnelly, C., Guldemond, R. A. R., Schooley, R. L., van Aarde, R. J., & Roca, A. L. (2024) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-024-02910-0 · Cited by 8
Buainain, N., Canton, R. C., Zuquim, G., Tuomisto, H., Hrbek, T., Sato, H., & RIBAS, C. C. (2020) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.15534 · Cited by 8
Neal, K. M., Fisher, R. N., Mitrovich, M., & Shaffer, H. B. (2020) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esaa049 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Shah, V. B., & McRae, B.
- Affiliations
- Interactive Supercomputing, Waltham, MA. USA
- The Nature Conservancy (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shah, Viral B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Python in Science Conference
- Publisher
- SciPy
- Published
- 2008-06-28
- Pages
- 62-65
- ISSN
- 2575-9752 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W171146931
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.13
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Python in Science Conferences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Keywords
- Circuitscape, landscape connectivity, ecological connectivity, circuit theory, random walk hypothesis, dispersal routes, conservation biology, Python
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
