Cited by 80Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Altered cingulate and insular cortex activation during risk-taking in methamphetamine dependence: losses lose impact

Open access
Gowin, Joshua L., Stewart, Jennifer L., May, April C., Ball, Tali M., Wittmann, Marc, Tapert, Susan F., Paulus, Martin P.·2014·Addiction

Abstract

AIMS: To determine if methamphetamine-dependent (MD) individuals exhibit behavioral or neural processing differences in risk-taking relative to healthy comparison participants (CTL). DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study comparing two groups' behavior on a risk-taking task and neural processing as assessed using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). SETTINGS: The study was conducted in an in-patient treatment center and a research fMRI facility in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-eight recently abstinent MD individuals recruited from a treatment program and 40 CTL recruited from the community completed the study. MEASUREMENTS: The study assessed risk-taking behavior (overall and post-loss) using the Risky Gains Task (RGT), sensation-seeking, impulsivity and blood-oxygenation-level-dependent activation in the brain during the decision phase of the RGT. FINDINGS: Relative to CTL, MD displayed decreased activation in the bilateral rostral anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and greater activation in the left insula across risky and safe decisions (P < 0.05). Right mid-insula activation among CTL did not vary between risky and safe decisions, but among MD it was higher during risky relative to safe decisions (P < 0.05). Among MD, lower activation in the right rostral ACC (r = -0.39, P < 0.01) and higher activation in the right mid-insula (r = 0.35, P < 0.01) during risky decisions were linked to a higher likelihood of choosing a risky option following a loss. CONCLUSIONS: Methamphetamine-dependent individuals show disrupted risk-related processing in both anterior cingulate and insula, brain areas that have been implicated in cognitive control and interoceptive processing. Attenuated neural processing of risky options may lead to risk-taking despite experiencing negative consequences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/add.12354

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Insula and anterior cingulate activation are atypical in individuals with addiction disorders during decision-making and risk-taking.

    “Similarly, insula and anterior cingulate activation have been found to be atypical in individuals with addiction disorders during decision-making and risk-taking (Gowin et al., 2014; Hoffman et al., 2008; London et al., 2005; Nestor et al., 2011; Paulus, Hozack, et al., 2003).”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Gowin et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gowin, J. L., Stewart, J. L., May, A. C., Ball, T. M., Wittmann, M., Tapert, S. F., & Paulus, M. P.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Gowin, Joshua L.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-10-24
Volume
109
Issue
2
Pages
237-247
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W1805061553
Cited by
80
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA016663, P20 DA027834, R01DA018307, P20DA027843, R21DA013186, R01DA027797)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
methamphetamine dependence, risk-taking, rostral anterior cingulate cortex, insula, brain activation, sensation seeking, impulsivity, cognitive control, interoception, loss aversion, decision-making
MeSH terms
Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Analysis of Variance, Cerebral Cortex, Compulsive Behavior, Decision Making, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Methamphetamine, Personality, Psychological Tests, Risk-Taking, Amphetamine-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review