Cited by 78Aquaculture Nutrition and GrowthInsect Utilization and EffectsAquaculture disease management and microbiota

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nutritional value of frass from black soldier fly larvae, Hermetia illucens, in a channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, diet

Abstract

Frass is the by-product of the larval meal industry and includes larval waste, exoskeleton sheds and residual feed ingredients. Experimental frass was derived from the larvae of black solder flies fed distillers' dried grains with solubles and had a protein and fat content of 216 and 60 g/kg, respectively. A 10-week study was conducted to evaluate the effect of dietary levels of frass on growth, feed utilization, and body proximate and mineral composition of channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus. Five diets containing 0, 50, 100, 200 and 300 g frass per kg diet were fed to channel catfish (5.24 ± 0.04 g) in quadruplicate aquaria to apparent satiation twice daily. Final weight gain was significantly increased in fish fed diets containing frass at levels from 100 to 300 g/kg. Fish fed diets without frass, and with 300 g/kg frass, showed the lowest and highest feed intake, respectively. Feed and protein efficiencies, however, were significantly lower in fish fed frass at levels of 200 g/kg and higher compared to the control diet. Survival, whole-body composition and mineral content were not affected by frass. In summary, black soldier fly larval frass has potential as a protein source or just an ingredient for enhancing palatability of catfish diets.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/anu.13040

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. 10.1016/j.cbpb.2014.06.003 · DOI
  2. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists), 1990, Official Methods of Analysis
  3. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.12.024 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.03.016 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s10695-015-0130-1 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.01.025 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.026 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Collavo A., 2005, Ecological implications of mini livestock: Potential of insects, rodents, frogs and snails, 519
  9. 10.1155/2016/7238679 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/0734242X09103838 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1006/fsim.2000.0315 · DOI
  12. FAO, 2016, The State of Word Fisheries and Aquaculture 2016 Contributing to Food Security and Nutrition for All, Rome
  13. 10.1002/zoo.20123 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/BF02124285 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.07.003 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2007.01704.x · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1365-2095.2007.00450.x · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.01.012 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.03.001 · DOI
  20. Hu J., 2017, Effects of substitution of fish meal with black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae meal, in yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco) diets, Israeli Journal of Aquaculture‐Bamidgeh, 69, 1
  21. 10.1007/s10144-011-0281-6 · DOI
  22. 10.1046/j.1467-2979.2003.00121.x · DOI
  23. 10.11118/actaun201058020147 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.08.041 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s13593-014-0235-4 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Li M. H., 2013, Feed Ingredients and Feeds for Channel Catfish
  27. 10.1080/15222055.2011.568857 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.1365-2095.2009.00650.x · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1749-7345.2009.00241.x · DOI
  30. 10.1016/0044-8486(84)90297-7 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/anu.12343 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.04.021 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.07.008 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/B978-0-08-020367-6.50007-6 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/j.1365-2095.2006.00400.x · DOI
  36. 10.1038/ejcn.2015.149 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.05.126 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.12.027 · DOI
  39. Rao L. M., 2000, Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in M cyprinoids from the harbor waters of Visakhapatnam, Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences, 19, 77
  40. 10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00099-6 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.068 · DOI
  42. Saxena A., 2000, Biochemical changes in liver and muscles of Channa gachua during reproductive cycle, Aquaculture, 1, 51
  43. 10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00177-5 · DOI
  44. 10.1002/jsfa.8081 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1111/j.1749-7345.2007.00101.x · DOI
  46. 10.3920/JIFF2014.0008 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/S1382-6689(02)00126-6 · DOI
  48. 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153704 · DOI
  49. Van Huis A., 2013, Edible insects. Future prospects for food and feed security, 201
  50. 10.1111/j.1365-2095.2004.00281.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yildirim‐Aksoy, M., Eljack, R., & Beck, B. H.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Service (US)
Corresponding author
Yildirim‐Aksoy, Mediha
Venue
Aquaculture Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-01-30
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
812-819
ISSN
  • 1353-5773 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2095
OpenAlex
W3004266499
Cited by
78
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Aquaculture Nutrition (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agricultural Research Service (6010‐32000‐026‐00‐D)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Utilization and Effects
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
Keywords
black soldier fly frass, Hermetia illucens, channel catfish, distillers dried grains with solubles, alternative protein sources, fish growth, feed efficiency, proximate composition, mineral composition, aquaculture feed ingredients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review