Cited by 168Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAnesthesia and Pain Management

Fear of childbirth and risk for birth complications in nulliparous women in the Danish National Birth Cohort

Laursen, M, Johansen, C, Hedegaard, M·2009·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Objectives To examine the associations between fear of childbirth and emergency caesarean section and between fear of childbirth and dystocia or protracted labour and fetal distress. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Danish National Birth Cohort. Population A total of 25 297 healthy nulliparous women in spontaneous labour with a single fetus in cephalic presentation at term following an uncomplicated pregnancy. Methods Data were collected during 1997–2003 from computer‐assisted telephone interviews twice in pregnancy linked with national health registers. Main outcome measures Risk for emergency caesarean section of women who feared childbirth; risk for dystocia/protracted labour or fetal distress of women who feared childbirth. Results Fear of childbirth in early (16 weeks, 6 ± 29 days) and late (31 weeks, 4 ± 21 days) pregnancy was associated with emergency caesarean section: OR, 1.23 (1.05–1.47) and 1.32 (1.13–1.55), respectively. When fear of childbirth was expressed at both interviews, the OR was 1.43 (1.13–1.80). Women who feared childbirth had an increased risk for dystocia or protracted labour (OR, 1.33; 1.15–1.54), but not for fetal distress (OR, 0.94; 0.72–1.23). Conclusions Fear of childbirth during pregnancy was associated with dystocia and emergency caesarean section but not with fetal distress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02250.x

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laursen, M., Johansen, C., & Hedegaard, M.
Affiliations
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
  • Danish Cancer Society (DK)
Corresponding author
Laursen, M
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-08-10
Volume
116
Issue
10
Pages
1350-1355
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W1515611648
Cited by
168
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
fear of childbirth, emergency cesarean section, dystocia, fetal distress, nulliparous women, spontaneous labor, term pregnancy, childbirth complications
MeSH terms
Adult, Cesarean Section, Denmark, Dystocia, Fear, Female, Fetal Distress, Humans, Labor, Obstetric, Obstetric Labor Complications, Parity, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review