Cited by 501Gastrointestinal motility and disordersPelvic floor disorders treatmentsHealth Education and Validation

Validity and reliability of the Bristol Stool Form Scale in healthy adults and patients with diarrhoea‐predominant irritable bowel syndrome

Open access
Blake, M. R., Raker, J. M., Whelan, K.·2016·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Summary: Background: The Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) is a 7‐point scale used extensively in clinical practice and research for stool form measurement, which has undergone limited validity and reliability testing. Aim: To determine the validity and reliability of the BSFS in measuring stool form in healthy adults and patients with diarrhoea‐predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS‐D). Methods: One hundred and sixty‐nine healthy volunteers provided a stool sample and used the BSFS to classify stool form, which was compared with measured stool water content and with values from 19 patients with IBS‐D. Eighty‐six volunteers used the BSFS to classify 26 stool models to determine accuracy and reliability. Results: Volunteers’ classifications of stool type correlated with stool water (Spearman's rho = 0.491, P < 0.001), which increased in hard (Types 1–2), normal (Types 3–5) and loose stools (Types 6–7) (P < 0.001). The BSFS detected differences in stool form between healthy volunteers (mean 3.7, s.d. 1.5) and IBS‐D patients (mean 5.0, s.d. 1.2) (P < 0.001). Overall, 977/1204 (81%) stool models were correctly classified (substantial accuracy, κ = 0.78), although <80% of Types 2, 3, 5 and 6 were classified correctly. On 852/1118 (76%) occasions, volunteers classified covert duplicate models to the same stool type (substantial reliability, κ = 0.72), but with only moderate reliability for Types 2 (63%, κ = 0.57) and 3 (62%, κ = 0.55). Conclusions: The BSFS demonstrated substantial validity and reliability, although difficulties arose around clinical decision points (Types 2, 3, 5, 6) that warrant investigation in larger clinical populations. Potential for improving validity and reliability through modifications to the BSFS or training in its use should be explored.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apt.13746

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Thompson WG, Heaton KW. Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Chapter 4, Diagnosis. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Health Press, 2003.
  2. Streiner DL, Norman GR, eds. Chapter 10, Validity. In: Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and use. 4th ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2008: 247-76.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blake, M. R., Raker, J. M., & Whelan, K.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Whelan, K.
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-08-05
Volume
44
Issue
7
Pages
693-703
ISSN
  • 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2036
OpenAlex
W2504563199
Cited by
495
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6
FWCI
16.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Own your potential (DEAKIN) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
Bristol Stool Form Scale, diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, stool water content, measurement validity, inter-rater reliability, healthy adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Diarrhea, Feces, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reproducibility of Results, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review