Cited by 16Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesMetallurgy and Cultural ArtifactsCultural Heritage Materials Analysis

Archaeomagnetic dating of pyrotechnological contexts: a case study for copper smelting sites in the central Timna Valley, Israel

Open access
Peters, I., Tauxe, L., Ben‐Yosef, E.·2018·Archaeometry

Abstract

This study is focused on establishing age constraints for several copper slag deposits at the centre of the Timna Valley (Israel) via reconstruction of their ancient geomagnetic intensities as recorded by the individual slag samples at the time of their formation. The results show a correlation between the location of the slag deposits (labelled as individual ‘mounds’ in our survey) and their inferred ages, reflecting varying socio‐economic and political dynamics in the region. While the slag mounds found at the unprotected foothills represent a variety of dates (mostly Early Islamic), the slag mounds on the hilltops are chronologically constrained to the early Iron Age (late 11th to 10th centuries bce), supporting the idea for a need for protection during this period. Furthermore, in comparing the new data with previous archaeomagnetic studies from Timna, we can assert the existence of simultaneous copper production at the archaeological Sites 30, 30a and 34. This gives further support to the claim of intense smelting in the central Timna Valley during the early Iron Age. Finally, this project demonstrates the potential of archaeomagnetic experiments to provide chronological insights, and their particular advantage in addressing pyrotechnology‐related cases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/arcm.12322

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the archaeological research of the Levant, the growing body of archaeomagnetic data enables an increasingly reliable dating method.

    “In the archaeological research of the Levant, the growing body of archaeomagnetic data [19–21] enables an increasingly reliable dating method [22–24].”

    From The Earth’s magnetic field in Jerusalem during the Babylonian destruction: A unique reference for field behavior and an anchor for archaeomagnetic dating (2020) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Results describe dating samples against a Levantine archaeointensity master curve, and the Conclusions report that the method constrained the ages of 9 of 14 sampled contexts. These passages support archaeomagnetic dating in the Levant, but do not establish that the method has become increasingly reliable. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Conrad, H. G., and Rothenberg, B. (eds.), 1980, Antikes Kupfer im Timna-Tal, Der Anschnitt Beiheft 1, Bochum, Deutsches Bergbau-Museum.
  2. Rothenberg, B. (ed.), 1990, Researches in the Araba 1959-1984, Vol. 2, The ancient metallurgy of copper, Institute for Archaeo-Metallurgical Studies, London.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peters, I., Tauxe, L., & Ben‐Yosef, E.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
Corresponding author
Ben‐Yosef, E.
Venue
Archaeometry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-06-28
Volume
60
Issue
3
Pages
554-570
ISSN
  • 0003-813X (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-4754
OpenAlex
W2729792165
Cited by
16
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archaeometry (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Sleep Foundation (EAR1345003)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
Keywords
archaeomagnetic dating, copper smelting, geomagnetic field intensity, Early Iron Age, early Islamic history, pyrotechnology, chronology, ancient metallurgy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review