Cited by 29Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryPsychology and Mental Health

Understanding individuals’ subjective experiences of negative symptoms of schizophrenia: a qualitative study.

Open access
Butcher, Isabelle, Berry, Katherine, Haddock, Gillian·2020·British Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Individuals with a diagnosis of schizophrenia often experience both positive and negative symptoms. Negative symptoms can be disabling and have a serious impact on everyday functioning. Despite the range of clinician-rated measurement tools used to assess negative symptoms, very little is known about how individuals subjectively experience these symptoms. This study sought to examine, using qualitative methods, how people living with a diagnosis of schizophrenia subjectively experience negative symptoms. DESIGN: Qualitative study. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were carried out with individuals with a diagnosis of schizophrenia who were experiencing negative symptoms. The sample was recruited from community and inpatient National Health Service mental health settings in the United Kingdom. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty individuals took part. Individuals highlighted the persistent and enduring nature of their negative symptoms. Two central themes were identified: What it is like to experience negative symptoms and where have my negative symptoms come from? Within the first theme, four sub-themes emerged: loss of concentration, loss of motivation, withdrawal, and 'feeling but not feeling'. Within the second theme, four sub-themes emerged related to the causes of negative symptoms: impact of traumatic life events, positive psychotic symptoms, impact of social network, and recreational and prescribed drug use. CONCLUSION: Individuals, who experience negative symptoms, were able to articulate the persistent and disabling nature of negative symptoms and clearly described factors which they believed contributed to the onset, exacerbation, and amelioration of the experiences. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Negative symptoms for people diagnosed with schizophrenia are persistent and enduring and impact an individual's life. There has been little research conducted qualitatively on individuals' subjective experiences of negative symptoms. Individuals who experience negative symptoms attribute these to a number of factors, including adverse life events, recreational and prescribed drug use, an absence of social support, and positive psychotic symptoms. Understanding negative symptoms is important for services, clinicians, and family members, where misattributions made about negative symptoms can lead to such experiences being dismissed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjc.12248

Cites

41 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study's outcomes are consistent with previous qualitative studies indicating that people with psychosis often link experiences of illness to trauma.

    “These outcomes are consistent with previous qualitative studies, indicating that people with psychosis often link experiences of illness to trauma (29, 30) and expand insight into meaning-making differences.”

    From Making meaning of trauma in psychosis (2023) · cites this paper as [29]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Butcher, I., Berry, K., & Haddock, G.
Affiliations
  • Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
  • Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Butcher, Isabelle
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-04-03
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
319-334
ISSN
  • 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8260
OpenAlex
W3014462592
Cited by
29
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council Doctoral Training Partnership, Medical Research Council (MR/N013751/1/)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
schizophrenia, negative symptoms, subjective experience, lived experience, loss of motivation, social withdrawal, traumatic life events, positive psychotic symptoms, social support, recreational drug use
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Schizophrenia, Qualitative Research, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review