Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 470

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A prospective phase III, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study of brodalumab in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis

Open access
Papp, K.A., Reich, K., Paul, C., Blauvelt, A., Baran, W., Bolduc, C., Toth, D., Langley, R.G., Cather, J., Gottlieb, A.B., Thaçi, D., Krueger, J.G., Russell, C.B., Milmont, C.E., Li, J., Klekotka, P.A., Kricorian, G., Nirula, A.·2016·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The interleukin-17 cytokine family plays a central role in psoriasis pathogenesis. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of brodalumab, a human anti-interleukin-17 receptor antibody, in treating patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: In this phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT01708590; AMAGINE-1), adult patients in the U.S.A., Canada and Europe were randomized to brodalumab (140 or 210 mg) or placebo every 2 weeks (Q2W), with an additional dose at week 1, for a 12-week induction phase. At week 12, patients receiving brodalumab who achieved static Physician's Global Assessment 0 or 1 (sPGA success) were rerandomized to the placebo or induction dose. After week 16, patients with sPGA ≥ 3 were re-treated with the induction dose. After ≥ 12 weeks of retreatment, patients with sPGA 2 for ≥ 4 weeks or sPGA ≥ 3 were rescued with brodalumab 210 mg Q2W. At week 12, patients randomized to brodalumab with sPGA ≥ 2 or placebo received brodalumab 210 mg Q2W. Coprimary end points were the percentage of patients with ≥ 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI 75) and sPGA success at week 12. RESULTS: There were 661 patients randomized: 220 placebo, 219 brodalumab 140 mg and 222 brodalumab 210 mg. At week 12, 60% (140 mg) and 83% (210 mg) vs. 3% (placebo) achieved PASI 75, and 54% (140 mg) and 76% (210 mg) vs. 1% (placebo) achieved sPGA success. The safety profile was considered acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: Brodalumab therapy resulted in significant clinical benefit and an acceptable safety profile in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjd.14493

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 470

Metadata

Authors
Papp, K. A., Reich, K., Paul, C., Blauvelt, A., Baran, W., Bolduc, C., Toth, D., Langley, R. G., Cather, J., Gottlieb, A. B., Thaçi, D., Krueger, J. G., Russell, C. B., Milmont, C. E., Li, J., Klekotka, P. A., Kricorian, G., & Nirula, A.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2016-06-23
Volume
175
Issue
2
Pages
273-286
ISSN
  • 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2133
OpenAlex
W2276035339
Cited by
470
References
21
FWCI
28.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A prospective phase III, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study of brodalumab in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/bjd.14493
The paper
Papp, K. A., Reich, K., Paul, C., Blauvelt, A., Baran, W., Bolduc, C., Toth, D., Langley, R. G., Cather, J., Gottlieb, A. B., Thaçi, D., Krueger, J. G., Russell, C. B., Milmont, C. E., Li, J., Klekotka, P. A., Kricorian, G., & Nirula, A. (2016). A prospective phase III, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study of brodalumab in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14493

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.