Cited by 169Online Learning and AnalyticsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningEducational Technology and Pedagogy

The promise and challenges of multimodal learning analytics

Open access
Cukurova, Mutlu, Giannakos, Michail, Martinez‐Maldonado, Roberto·2020·British Journal of Educational Technology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjet.13015

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most studies that use emergent and multimodal data to examine collaboration unobtrusively are conducted in lab settings or involve non-student participants.

    “of the limited number of studies that use emergent and multimodal data to examine collaboration unobtrusively, most are conducted in lab settings (Cukurova et al., 2020) or involve non-student participants.”

    From An unobtrusive approach to modelling team cohesion and collaboration in ecological classroom settings (2026) · cites this paper as Cukurova et al., 2020

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says MMLA systems are rarely evaluated in physical real-world spaces and calls for more work in authentic learning settings, supporting the general concern about study settings. It does not establish that most studies using multimodal data to examine collaboration unobtrusively are conducted in labs. The separate point about non-student participants is not attached to this citation. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [1]1. Ahn, T. B. and Harley, J. (2020). Exploring Emotions and Multimodal Learning Analytics: Eye- tracking and Facial Recognition. British Journal of Educational Technology.
  2. [8]8. Cukurova, M. (2019). Learning analytics as AI extenders in education: Multimodal machine learning versus multimodal learning analytics. In Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence and Adaptive Education Conference (pp. 1-3).
  3. [24]24. Nigay, L., & Coutaz, J. (1993). A design space for multimodal systems: Concurrent processing and data fusion. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing
  4. [28]28. Olsen, J., Sharma, K., Rummel, N. and Aleven, V. (2020). Using Multimodal Data to Temporally Analyze Collaborative Learning Outcomes: Benefits and Challenges. British Journal of Educational Technology.
  5. [39]39. Vujovic, M., Hernàndez-Leo, D., Tassani, S. and Spikol, D., (2020). Studying collaborative learning and space design with multimodal learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cukurova, M., Giannakos, M., & Martinez‐Maldonado, R.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Monash University Clayton VIC Australia
Venue
British Journal of Educational Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-07-29
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
1441-1449
ISSN
  • 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8535
OpenAlex
W3046090708
Cited by
169
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 4
FWCI
14.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Educational Technology (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
Keywords
multimodal learning analytics, multimodal data, learning analytics, data integration, educational data mining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review